<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>violates Archives - Home Safety Tech Pros</title>
	<atom:link href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/violates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/violates/</link>
	<description>Home Safety Tech Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 10:47:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Deletion of Jan. 6 database violates federal law: CREW</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 10:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deletion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6 capitol attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violates]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Left: Jan. 6 rioters during the 2021 Capitol attack (Department of Justice). Right: President-elect Donald Trump arrives to speak at a meeting of the House GOP conference, Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon). The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a federal watchdog group, has penned an open letter to the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/">Deletion of Jan. 6 database violates federal law: CREW</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_500398" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-500398" class="size-full wp-image-500398" src="https://am22.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/01/TrumpJan.-6.jpg" alt="Left: Jan. 6 rioters during the 2021 Capitol attack (Department of Justice). Right: President-elect Donald Trump arrives to speak at a meeting of the House GOP conference, Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-500398" class="wp-caption-text">Left: Jan. 6 rioters during the 2021 Capitol attack (Department of Justice). Right: President-elect Donald Trump arrives to speak at a meeting of the House GOP conference, Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).</p>
</div>
<p>The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/alito-harmed-our-democracy-watchdog-demands-scotus-create-ethics-code-enforcement-mechanism-to-investigate-crisis-after-justice-flew-far-right-conspiracy-theory-flags/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">federal watchdog</a> group, has penned an open letter to the Inspector General of the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/as-a-result-of-the-election-jack-smith-is-calling-it-quits-in-jan-6-case-against-trump-cites-department-of-justice-policy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Department of Justice</a> and the Archivist of the United States, urging them to “take action” and investigate the DOJ’s removal of its <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/traitors-get-shot-capitol-rioter-who-lit-the-match-on-jan-6-ordered-to-stay-away-from-son-who-turned-him-in-and-is-terrified-of-his-dad-retaliating/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6</a> database — detailing criminal charges and convictions related to the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/jan-6-capitol-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2021 Capitol attack</a> — which they call a “likely violation” of federal law.</p>
<p>“The Department of Justice’s removal of this vital information about its prosecutions arising from the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol is consistent with President Trump’s ongoing efforts to rewrite or erase the insurrection,” the <a href="https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Letter-to-Archivist-DOJ-IG-re-J6-Website-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CREW letter</a> reads. “We request that you promptly investigate this matter and take appropriate corrective action if necessary.”</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>The DOJ’s database removal first came to light last week after <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/trump-secures-25-million-settlement-from-meta-and-mark-zuckerberg-over-first-amendment-lawsuit-ridiculed-by-legal-experts/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">President Donald Trump</a> issued his <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/galvanized-and-ready-family-members-of-jan-6-rioters-and-their-victims-say-theyre-terrified-of-whats-to-come-now-that-trump-pardons-actually-happened/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6 pardons</a> on his first day in office, with <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/25/politics/january-6-justice-department-database/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CNN</a> reporting Sunday that only parts of the database were still accessible through the Internet Archive, while everything else was scrubbed clean.</p>
<p>“This is a huge victory for J6ers,” <a href="https://x.com/BrandonStraka/status/1883210738472251808" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a> pardoned Jan. 6 rioter Brandon Straka on X.</p>
<p>“This site was one of countless weapons of harassment used by the federal government to make life impossible for its targets from J6,” Straka said. “The site included every accusation, and every charge leveled against people, including the ones they were not convicted of and were never substantiated in court, and would appear as the top ranking search result. In other words, every time a potential employer, landlord, new social or business contact, etc, would search somebody targeted for J6 they would read a dossier on each person filled with FBI and FOJ accusations and narratives that were never proven, along with links to documents with even more damaging allegations.”</p>
<p>According to CREW’s letter, removing the Jan. 6 database appears to be a violation of <a href="https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2018-title44/USCODE-2018-title44-chap31-sec3106" target="_blank" rel="noopener">44 U.S.C. § 3106</a> — the unlawful removal or destruction of records — which requires the head of each federal agency to notify the Archivist of the United States of “any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, corruption, deletion, erasure, or other destruction of records in the custody of the agency,” per CREW.</p>
<p>“Implementing this requirement, NARA regulations provide that an “agency must report promptly any unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records in the custody of that agency to NARA,&#8221;” the group’s letter says. “The regulations also specify certain details the agency ‘must include’ in its report to NARA. The knowing and willful destruction of federal records is a crime punishable by fines and up to three years of imprisonment.”</p>
<p>CREW claims that the Jan. 6 database “clearly qualifies as a federal record” as it documented the DOJ’s functions and decisions related to investigations and prosecutions related to the 2021 Capitol attack.</p>
<p>“The database must be managed as a federal record and its deletion is subject to the § 3106 notice requirements,” the letter to the DOJ says. “Despite the agency’s requirement to notify the archivist of the deletion of these records, there is no indication that they reported this matter to NARA, and a list of open ‘unauthorized disposition cases’ on NARA’s website does not reveal any such reporting.”</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/what-i-did-was-ungodly-jan-6-rioter-who-caused-deadly-dui-crash-while-driving-drunk-on-wrong-side-of-highway-goes-from-pardon-to-prison/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">More from Law&amp;Crime: ‘What I did was ungodly’: Jan. 6 rioter who caused deadly DUI crash while driving drunk on wrong side of highway goes from pardon to prison</a></strong></p>
<p>While there may not be an online record anymore, at least one Jan. 6 judge — Bill Clinton appointee <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/clear-and-compelling-interest-judge-orders-army-to-expedite-records-about-trumps-controversial-visit-to-arlington-national-cemetery/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Paul Friedman</a> — has decided to take matters into his own hands by creating his own 138-page list of Capitol riot defendants, which he attached to his most recent ruling granting a DOJ dismissal to rioter <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/active-duty-marine-corps-major-arrested-at-quantico-for-allegedly-assaulting-officer-during-capitol-siege/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Christopher Warnagiris</a>.</p>
<p>“Department of Justice chart documenting sentences in Capitol breach cases,” the list’s title reads.</p>
<p>In addition to the DOJ database, the FBI’s online record of individuals who were still wanted in connection with Jan. 6 also no longer exists. Attempts by Law&amp;Crime to reach the DOJ and FBI for comment on Thursday were unsuccessful.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/efforts-to-erase-the-insurrection-deletion-of-jan-6-database-by-trump-administration-appears-to-violate-federal-law-watchdog-says/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/">Deletion of Jan. 6 database violates federal law: CREW</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/TrumpJan.-6.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
            	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court will decide whether TikTok ban violates the First Amendment</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-tiktok-ban-violates-the-first-amendment/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-tiktok-ban-violates-the-first-amendment/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 06:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TikTok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violates]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-tiktok-ban-violates-the-first-amendment/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Home Daily News Supreme Court will decide whether TikTok… U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court will decide whether TikTok ban violates the First Amendment By Debra Cassens Weiss December 18, 2024, 2:17 pm CST The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider the constitutionality of a law that bans TikTok in the United States if the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-tiktok-ban-violates-the-first-amendment/">Supreme Court will decide whether TikTok ban violates the First Amendment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="story_page_body" style="margin:0; padding:0; max-width:750px;">
		<!-- begin main content area --></p>
<ol class="breadcrumb">
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/" title="Home">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/" title="Read the Daily News">Daily News</a></li>
<li class="active">Supreme Court will decide whether TikTok…</li>
</ol>
<p>U.S. Supreme Court</p>
<h2>Supreme Court will decide whether TikTok ban violates the First Amendment</h2>
<p>			<!-- toolbar --></p>
<p class="byline">By <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/authors/4/" title="View this author's information" style="color:{default_link_color};">Debra Cassens Weiss</a></p>
<p class="dateline"><time>December 18, 2024, 2:17 pm CST</time></p>
<p>				<!-- primary story image --></p>
<div class="floating_image" style="max-width:750px; margin:20px 10px 10px 0;">
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_gavel_and_tiktok.jpg" alt="TikTok on phone and gavel" height="334" width="500"/></p>
<p><em>The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider the constitutionality of a law that bans TikTok in the United States if the company isn’t sold. (Photo from Shutterstock)</em></p>
</p></div>
<p>				<!-- end primary story image --></p>
<p>			<!--no pagination logic--></p>
<p>The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider the constitutionality of a law that bans TikTok in the United States if the company isn&#8217;t sold.</p>
<p>Oral arguments in the First Amendment challenge are scheduled for Jan. 10 in two consolidated cases seeking emergency applications for an injunction. One was filed by TikTok and ByteDance, its owner. The other was filed by TikTok users.</p>
<p>The TikTok ban is “a massive and unprecedented speech restriction,” the company argued in its <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A587/335257/20241216144658388_TikTok%20Inc.%20v.%20Garland%20-%20SCOTUS%20Application%20for%20Injunction.pdf">Supreme Court request</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/12/justices-to-hear-argument-on-tiktok-ban-on-jan-10">SCOTUSblog</a>, <a href="https://www.law360.com/publicpolicy/articles/2275727">Law360</a>, the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/12/18/supreme-court-tik-tok-ban-challenge">Washington Post</a> and the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/18/us/politics/supreme-court-tiktok-ban.html?campaign_id=60&amp;emc=edit_na_20241218&amp;instance_id=142578&amp;nl=breaking-news&amp;regi_id=66831313&amp;segment_id=186058&amp;user_id=dc3af506e773205a30e65c26527afe73">New York Times</a> are among the publications with coverage.</p>
<p>TikTok must be sold or face a U.S. ban under the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. The law bans apps controlled by China and three countries identified as foreign adversaries of the United States, SCOTUSblog explains. The deadline for compliance is Jan. 19.</p>
<p>Lawmakers who supported the law said TikTok is a security threat because the Chinese government has oversight of private companies, the New York Times explains.</p>
<p>In an <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A587/335445/20241218103859536_TikTok%20Brief.pdf">amicus brief</a>, Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said TikTok is a threat because it is “under the direct control of the Chinese Communist Party.”</p>
<p>The goal of the law, the brief said, “is to further the highly compelling state interest of preventing Chinese Communist mining of American data and deployment of subversive enemy propaganda through algorithmic curation.”</p>
<p>TikTok users’ <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A588/335283/20241216154247032_Firebaugh%20v.%20Garland%20--%20SCOTUS%20Injunction%20Application.pdf">injunction application</a> notes that Vice President Kamala Harris and President-elect Donald Trump campaigned on TikTok during the 2024 presidential election, “thereby implicitly encouraging Americans to use the app.”</p>
<p>Trump <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/syndicated/article/tiktok-asks-scotus-to-block-law-that-would-shut-down-app">said at a news conference</a> on Monday he has a “warm spot in my heart for TikTok.”</p>
<p>The Supreme Court granted review after treating the emergency injunction applications as cert petitions, as suggested by the briefs.</p>
</p></div>
<p><script src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=250025978358202&amp;xfbml=1"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/supreme-court-to-decide-whether-tiktok-ban-violates-the-first-amendment/?utm_source=feeds&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-tiktok-ban-violates-the-first-amendment/">Supreme Court will decide whether TikTok ban violates the First Amendment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-tiktok-ban-violates-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_gavel_and_tiktok.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
            	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
