record Archives - Home Safety Tech Pros

Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan for the Redding and Arcata Field Offices Northwest California Integrated Resource Management Plan, CA; Correction

homesafetytechpros — Sat, 15 Mar 2025 04:34:41 +0000

The BLM manages more than 245 million acres of public land located primarily in 12 western states, including Alaska, on behalf of the American people. The BLM also administers 700 million acres of sub-surface mineral estate throughout the nation. Our mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of America’s public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.

Source link

The post Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan for the Redding and Arcata Field Offices Northwest California Integrated Resource Management Plan, CA; Correction appeared first on Home Safety Tech Pros.

Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan for the Redding and Arcata Field Offices Northwest California Integrated Resource Management Plan, CA

homesafetytechpros — Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:08:01 +0000

< All Notices & Rules

Source link

Liberty University hit with record fine over campus safety

homesafetytechpros — Wed, 06 Mar 2024 04:22:36 +0000

FILE — A sign marks the entrance to Liberty University, March 24, 2020, in Lynchburg, Va. Liberty University has agreed to pay an unprecedented $14 million fine after the Christian school failed to disclose information about crimes that occurred on its Lynchburg campus, including those involving sexual assaults, the U.S. Department of Education announced Tuesday, March 5, 2024. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)

The U.S. Department of Education imposed a record $14 million fine on Liberty University over rampant violations of federal law related to campus safety, authorities announced on Tuesday. The investigation into the university was prompted by a 2021 lawsuit alleging repeat mishandling of sexual assault complaints.

Federal officials issued the fine against the Virginia-based evangelical Christian institution for failure to comply with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security and Campus Crime Statistics Act. The law passed in 1990, mandates certain crime reporting requirements for schools that receive federal student aid funds.

The $14 million fine was assessed against Liberty as part of a settlement agreement over “material and ongoing violations” violations of their obligations under the Clery Act, including “its published crime statistics and treatment of sexual assault survivors,” the Department of Education said in a press release.

“This is the largest fine ever imposed for violating the Clery Act,” the agency said.

The penalty caps a two-year-long investigation that assessed the university’s compliance with federal law dating back to 2016.

In a 106-page report, regulators said they uncovered “serious, persistent, and systemic violations” over the seven years.

“During the review period, Liberty did not have an effective internal control structure or an adequate communication and coordination strategy to facilitate compliance with the applicable requirements,” the report reads.

The government found that Liberty lacked the administrative capacity to comply with the Clery Act between 2016 and 2023. As a result, the Jerry Falwell-founded university issued inaccurate and incomplete annual security reports, failed to collect, disclose, properly classify, and publicize crime statistics, and failed to issue emergency alerts and campuswide warnings.

The university was also seriously remiss in its obligations under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) — which amended the Clery Act.

“[T]he Department has found that, among other crimes, the University was especially neglectful in documenting the VAWA offenses of stalking, domestic violence and dating violence when at least one of these incidents occurred as a part of the same transaction or occurrence as a primary criminal offense,” regulators wrote.

The report spends significant time discussing those VAWA failures:

Liberty is reminded that the exceptions identified here constitute serious and persistent violations of the VAWA provisions of the Clery Act that, by their nature, cannot be cured. There is no way to truly “correct” violations of this type once they occur. The multiple and persistent failures to comply with the sexual violence prevention and response requirements of the Clery Act caused direct harm to victims of sex crimes and sexual misconduct as defined by the institution’s policies. These deficiencies also resulted in serious violations of Federal law that undermined the intended purpose of these provisions.

Regulators also cited Liberty’s lack of maintaining accurate and complete daily crime logs throughout the review period.

“Students, faculty, and staff deserve to know that they can be safe and secure in their school communities. We respond aggressively to complaints about campus safety and security,” Federal Student Aid Chief Operating Officer Richard Cordray said in a statement. “Through the Clery Act schools are obligated to take action that creates safe and secure campus communities, investigate complaints, and responsibly disclose information about crimes and other safety concerns. We will continue to hold schools accountable if they fail to do so.”

Liberty hailed the end of the inquiry but complained about the scope.

“The Department’s Clery Act Program Review covered more than seven years and is, by far, the most extensive review period of any higher education institution in the Department’s history of published reviews,” a press release issued by the school reads. “Many of the Department’s methodologies, findings, and calculations in the report were drastically different from their historic treatment of other universities. Liberty disagrees with this unfair treatment.”

As part of the agreement, Liberty agreed to spend $2 million over the next two years on campus security and compliance upgrades.

“While the university maintains that we have repeatedly endured selective and unfair treatment by the Department, the university also concurs there were numerous deficiencies that existed in the past,” the school’s press release goes on. “We acknowledge and regret these past failures and have taken these necessary improvements seriously.”

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Source link

The post Liberty University hit with record fine over campus safety appeared first on Home Safety Tech Pros.

Want to clear a criminal record? This lawyer has an app for that

homesafetytechpros — Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:26:01 +0000

A Rasa team member (left) helps a woman register for the Rasa app at a legal clinic at Arizona State University in Phoenix. Photo courtesy of Rasa.

The impact for people clearing their criminal records can be life-changing, leading to long-term employment and financial security. And research shows that it also helps prevent recidivism. But the path to expungement is not always easy, requiring people with criminal records to navigate an unfamiliar, costly and drawn-out process. That’s where lawyer Noella Sudbury comes in.

In 2022, she launched an app called Rasa to provide a quick, cheap and easy solution for people who want a fresh start, automating the process of expungement from start to finish.

Sudbury, the first lawyer in her family, says she developed a keen interest in criminal justice reform after working as a public defender. During that time, she saw her clients hitting a brick wall when they tried to rent an apartment, secure loans or get a job.

That inspired her to create an app that could tackle the issue at scale, and Rasa is currently available for people trying to clear their records in Utah and Arizona.

In this episode of the Legal Rebels Podcast, the Rasa founder and CEO tells the ABA Journal’s Matt Reynolds about some of the challenges that she faced in getting Rasa off the ground and her plans to expand the app beyond Utah and Arizona.

Want to listen on the go? Legal Rebels is available on several podcast listening services. Subscribe and never miss an episode.
Apple | Spotify | Google Play

In This Podcast:

Noella Sudbury. Photo courtesy of Rasa.

" style="vertical-align:text-top; max-width:80px;"/>

Noella Sudbury. Photo courtesy of Rasa.

Noella Sudbury is an attorney with over a decade of experience in criminal law, policy and data-driven justice reform. She led a successful campaign to pass Utah’s Clean Slate law, which automates the expungement process for more than 450,000 Utahns, and has assisted other state campaigns to pass automatic clearance. In her spare time, Sudbury enjoys the outdoors and spending time with her two daughters. In 2023, she was named by Inc. Magazine as one of the top 200 most dynamic female founders in America.

Source link

The post Want to clear a criminal record? This lawyer has an app for that appeared first on Home Safety Tech Pros.

Trump administration had worst Supreme Court record since at least FDR years, study says

homesafetytechpros — Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:56:10 +0000

U.S. Supreme Court

Trump administration had worst Supreme Court record since at least FDR years, study says

By Debra Cassens Weiss

January 4, 2024, 8:39 am CST

“Our study of voting data from Supreme Court terms 1937-2021 shows that the Roberts Court is the most ‘anti-president’ court in that period,” according two professors at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. Image from Shutterstock.

The U.S. Supreme Court is dominated by six conservative justices, including three appointed by former President Donald Trump.

But the Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts “has not been particularly receptive” to Trump’s arguments, showing that there is some truth in his claim that the justices “love to rule against me,” the New York Times reports in a Dec. 21 story.

Indeed, the New York Times says, the Trump administration’s Supreme Court record is worst than any other administration since at least the presidency of former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

The New York Times points to data from Lee Epstein and Rebecca L. Brown, professors at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, who wrote about their findings for Presidential Studies Quarterly in June 2023.

“Our study of voting data from Supreme Court terms 1937-2021 shows that the Roberts Court is the most ‘anti-president’ court in that period,” they wrote in an abstract of their article.

The average win rate for presidents over that period was 65.2%. Trump fared the worst, with a win rate of 43.5%, followed by former President Barack Obama, who had a win rate of 52.4%, and President Joe Biden, who had a win rate of 56.5% through the court’s 2021 term.

The win rates are based on orally argued cases that implicated presidential power, including cases in which a party was the United States, an executive department or a department head, an independent agency or the president.

Low presidential win rates before the Roberts Court partly reflect the court’s disdain for the administrative state, as some commentators have suggested, according to Epstein and Brown. But data also reflects Roberts Court rulings against a president in high-stakes disputes, they said.

To evaluate high-stakes disputes, the researchers looked at a subset of cases focused on presidential overreach that appear in constitutional law textbooks, along with cases that made the front page of the New York Times the day after issuance.

The presidential win rate was only 35% in high-stakes cases before the Roberts Court, the lowest win rate for high-stakes cases since the 1937 term.

Partisanship may also play a role, Epstein and Brown concluded. The presidential win rate before justices appointed by that president was 58% in high-stakes case before the Roberts Court, compared to 36% before Roberts Court justices not appointed by a president.

In an email to the New York Times, Epstein and Brown said they can’t say whether Trump’s poor performance “speaks to the court’s view of him and his administration or to the justices’ increasing willingness to check executive authority.”

“Either way, though, the data suggest a bumpy road for Trump in cases implicating presidential power,” they wrote in the email.

The New York Times points outs that several Trump cases “are at the court or on its threshold,” including cases on immunity from prosecution, the viability of an election-interference charge, and whether Colorado can bar Trump from the ballot.

On Wednesday, Trump asked the Supreme Court to quickly rule in the Colorado case and “return the right to vote for their candidate of choice to the voters,” the Washington Post reports.

Source link

The post Trump administration had worst Supreme Court record since at least FDR years, study says appeared first on Home Safety Tech Pros.