<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jan Archives - Home Safety Tech Pros</title>
	<atom:link href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/jan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/jan/</link>
	<description>Home Safety Tech Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 05:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Trump DOJ opposes giving Jan. 6 defendant access to evidence</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/trump-doj-opposes-giving-jan-6-defendant-access-to-evidence/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/trump-doj-opposes-giving-jan-6-defendant-access-to-evidence/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 05:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defendant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ed martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james boasberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pardon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. capitol attack]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/trump-doj-opposes-giving-jan-6-defendant-access-to-evidence/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Insets: Ryan Zink (Department of Justice). Background: FILE — Violent rioters loyal to President Donald Trump storm the Capitol in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File). A Jan. 6 defendant from Texas who ran for Congress last year and is reportedly attempting another political run has been granted permission to “examine and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/trump-doj-opposes-giving-jan-6-defendant-access-to-evidence/">Trump DOJ opposes giving Jan. 6 defendant access to evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_519908" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-519908" class="size-full wp-image-519908" src="https://am24.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/04/Ryan-Zink.jpg" alt="Insets: Ryan Zink (Department of Justice). Background: FILE - Violent rioters loyal to President Donald Trump storm the Capitol in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-519908" class="wp-caption-text">Insets: Ryan Zink (Department of Justice). Background: FILE — Violent rioters loyal to President Donald Trump storm the Capitol in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File).</p>
</div>
<p>A <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/cannot-simply-act-as-a-rubber-stamp-judge-challenges-dojs-seemingly-inconsistent-effort-to-toss-jan-6-defendants-gun-case-over-trump-pardon/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6</a> defendant from <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/crime/evil-judge-doxxed-and-threatened-after-reducing-bond-for-track-meet-stabbing-suspect-while-the-teen-is-being-attacked-over-his-900k-house/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Texas</a> who ran for <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/congress/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Congress</a> last year and is reportedly attempting another political run has been granted permission to “examine and publish” footage, evidence and discovery from his criminal case surrounding the events of the 2021 Capitol attack — but the Justice Department says not so fast.</p>
<p>Ryan Zink, 35, of Lubbock, was granted access last week by <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/a-solemn-mockery-of-the-constitution-itself-judge-moves-to-hold-trump-admin-in-criminal-contempt-over-deportation-flights-ordered-to-turn-around/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">U.S. District Judge James Boasberg</a> on account of the DOJ not filing a memorandum in opposition to Zink’s March 22 motion to lift a protective order keeping his case material sealed. Boasberg issued a minute order on April 9 announcing his decision, which the DOJ apparently saw and responded to Wednesday with the document in question.</p>
<p>“As the Government has not opposed Defendant’s Motion to Lift Protective Order, the Court orders that the Motion is granted, and the Protective Order is lifted,” a docket entry from Boasberg said last week.</p>
<p>In response, the DOJ’s top prosecutor in Washington, D.C., <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/martins-client-is-not-president-trump-dcs-top-prosecutor-has-fundamental-misunderstanding-of-the-role-and-needs-to-be-investigated-former-us-attorneys-say/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ed Martin</a>, signed off on a memorandum in opposition Wednesday that said granting such a request to Zink would put people at risk and pose a threat to national security.</p>
<p>“Lifting a protective order in this case creates a dangerous opportunity and could potentially place sensitive information in the possession of those who would use it to harm the national security, in addition to allowing terabytes of information including individual defendants’, witnesses’, and victims’ personal identifying information to be released to the public,” Martin said. “The government has thus demonstrated that release of these materials could cause a significant hazard to others, and there is no prejudice to the defendant from continuing the protective order here.”</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>Zink, who was <a href="https://www.ntd.com/freed-jan-6-prisoners-seek-congressional-office_1060829.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">defeated in the Republican primary</a> last year, is <a href="https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/texas-ryan-zink-jan-6/2025/03/26/id/1204514/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reportedly</a> running for a seat in Texas’ 19th District. He was found guilty in the District of Columbia back in 2023 of three charges related to Jan. 6, including one felony and two misdemeanor offenses.</p>
<p>“While on restricted grounds immediately outside the Capitol building, Zink filmed a series of video clips,” the DOJ said in a <a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/texas-man-found-guilty-felony-and-misdemeanor-charges-related-jan-6-capitol-breach" target="_blank" rel="noopener">press release</a> announcing his conviction.</p>
<p>“In one clip, the defendant recorded himself stating, ‘We knocked down the gates! We’re storming the Capitol! You can’t stop us!&#8221;” the DOJ said. “In the same video, Zink panned the phone camera to show the crowd around him and later began chanting, ‘We want Trump!’ as he moved through the crowd at the footsteps of the Capitol.”</p>
<p>Zink was caught on video and audio saying several different things that were brought up by DOJ prosecutors in his case file.</p>
<p>“You all want to know how it’s going? We are going to bum rush this s—!” he allegedly said in one clip.</p>
<p>“In a second video, the defendant filmed the crowd as it attempted to breach the Rotunda Doors to the Capitol,” the DOJ alleged. “Zink stated, ‘They’re not going to get this one.&#8217;”</p>
<p>In a third video, the DOJ said Zink shouted, “You wanted to see what it’s become? We’re in the doors!” Toward the end, he allegedly turned the camera to capture another individual smashing out a window near the Rotunda Doors.</p>
<p>“Broke down the doors,” Zink later allegedly wrote in text messages obtained by the DOJ. “Pushed Congress out of session … I’ll be posting pictures in a little bit when we get back … we accomplished the job,” Zink said.</p>
<p>He allegedly added, “I’m afraid the time for rioting is over better clean those guns and invest in some level 4 armor.”</p>
<p>Martin said Wednesday in the government’s opposition filing that since Zink has been pardoned by <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/donald-trump/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">President Donald Trump</a>, like other Jan. 6 defendants, “there is no need for further discovery, and the defendant does not have any First Amendment right to the discovery provided to him.”</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/entitled-to-reimbursement-trump-doj-says-jan-6-defendants-deserve-to-get-restitution-refunds-after-having-cases-invalidated/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>More Law&amp;Crime coverage: ‘Entitled to reimbursement’: Trump DOJ says Jan. 6 defendants deserve to get restitution refunds after having cases ‘invalidated’</strong></a></p>
<p>Martin claimed the protective order “continues to operate to protect information that is vital to national security” and “significantly affects the privacy rights of victims and witnesses, even after the conclusion of the investigation and prosecution,” per the filing.</p>
<p>“The defendant has cited no authority or rationale to release this volume of material, protected by these orders in hundreds of similar cases, in such a wholesale fashion, where this material is no longer necessary to his defense and could cause such damage to the national security and rights of third parties, including witnesses and victims,” Martin said.</p>
<p>“The defendant’s argument that the government should make its discovery databases available to the public fails to address the vast amount of information that has already been made public through the government’s investigations and prosecutions of these cases,” Martin added. “The events of January 6, and the ensuing investigations and prosecutions, are important to our history as a nation — events that must be considered through appropriate public access to government records and through public discourse. But criminal discovery is not the appropriate mechanism to vindicate that interest.”</p>
<p>Martin accused Zink of trying to “abuse the discovery process,” even though his counsel was given access to the materials in question while defending him.</p>
<p>“The defendant has no further right to, nor need of, the discovery in this matter,” Martin concluded. “The Court should deny the defendant’s motion.”</p>
<p>Zink’s attorney, Roger Roots, argued in their motion that he and other defendants — along with journalists, researchers and the public as a whole — have a right to examine and publish the footage, evidence and discovery that’s in question.</p>
<p>“The vast majority — perhaps almost the entirety — of camera footage, film and photos collected in these discovery databases do not concern any locations of the Capitol which are off-limits to the public,” the motion said. “Indeed millions of tourists have seen and been in the hallways and areas.”</p>
<p>Roots claimed that the public and press have a “presumptive First Amendment right of access” to judicial proceedings in criminal cases, which gives Zink the ability to make such a request.</p>
<p>“The roots of public access to court proceedings and records lie in ‘democratic values of accountability and openness,&#8217;” the motion said. “Few cases could be more crucial for publication of all court files and records than Zink’s case, and January 6 cases in general. January 6 cases are famously political, and President Trump has called the prosecutions a “grave national injustice.” Accordingly, the public’s interest is even more accentuated than in other types of cases.”</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/email-newsletter/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&amp;Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.</strong></a></p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/creates-a-dangerous-opportunity-trump-doj-opposes-letting-jan-6-defendant-examine-and-publish-footage-evidence-and-discovery-surrounding-capitol-attack/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/trump-doj-opposes-giving-jan-6-defendant-access-to-evidence/">Trump DOJ opposes giving Jan. 6 defendant access to evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/trump-doj-opposes-giving-jan-6-defendant-access-to-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Ryan-Zink.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jan. 6 defendant with gun, grenade case gets Trump pardon</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/jan-6-defendant-with-gun-grenade-case-gets-trump-pardon/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/jan-6-defendant-with-gun-grenade-case-gets-trump-pardon/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defendant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grenade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pardon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tampa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. capitol attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington d.c.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/jan-6-defendant-with-gun-grenade-case-gets-trump-pardon/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Left: President Donald Trump gives remarks during an event celebrating the 2024 Stanley Cup Champion the Florida Panthers in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 3, 2025 (Photo by Aaron Schwartz/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images). Right: An alleged photo of Jeremy Brown at the U.S. Capitol during the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/jan-6-defendant-with-gun-grenade-case-gets-trump-pardon/">Jan. 6 defendant with gun, grenade case gets Trump pardon</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_517176" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-517176" class="size-full wp-image-517176" src="https://am23.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/04/Trump-and-Jeremy-Brown.jpg" alt="Left: President Donald Trump gives remarks during an event celebrating the 2024 Stanley Cup Champion the Florida Panthers in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 3, 2025 (Photo by Aaron Schwartz/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images). Right: An alleged photo of Jeremy Brown at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 attack in 2021 (Justice Department)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-517176" class="wp-caption-text">Left: President Donald Trump gives remarks during an event celebrating the 2024 Stanley Cup Champion the Florida Panthers in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 3, 2025 (Photo by Aaron Schwartz/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images). Right: An alleged photo of Jeremy Brown at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 attack in 2021 (Justice Department).</p>
</div>
<p>A <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/it-is-not-entirely-clear-on-what-basis-he-even-seeks-a-vacatur-judge-bemoans-effort-by-jan-6-defendant-to-link-gun-and-drug-case-to-trump-pardon/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6</a> defendant and <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/oath-keepers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Oath Keepers</a> member from <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/florida/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Florida</a> who was linked to an explosives-laden RV that was allegedly brought to the Washington, D.C., area had a series of separate convictions — for possessing illegal firearms and U.S. Army grenades — officially vacated and dismissed by a federal judge Wednesday in the Sunshine State as part of <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/would-defy-rationality-trump-appointed-judge-rejects-administrations-claim-that-jan-6-rioters-pardon-extends-to-firearm-convictions/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">President Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 pardon order</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/bogus-additional-charges-pardoned-jan-6-rioters-who-fled-justice-or-were-sentenced-for-separate-crimes-are-not-out-of-the-woods/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jeremy Brown</a>, a former U.S. Army Green Beret who was given a seven-year sentence for the weapons and grenades case, gained support from Trump’s <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/justice-department/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Justice Department</a> in late February, with federal prosecutors telling U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday that “based on consultation” with DOJ leadership it was the position of the United States that the offenses Brown was accused of — including possessing a modified AR-15 short-barreled rifle and sawed-off shotgun, both unregistered and owned illegally — were “intended to be covered” by Trump’s pardon order.</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>Merryday, a George H.W. Bush appointee, agreed and on Wednesday vacated Brown’s convictions <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25877685-jan-6-defendantgrenade-order/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">with an official order</a> in the Middle District of Florida Tampa Division. The move came after the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals relinquished jurisdiction in March to the district court to “consider and rule upon” the United States’ motion to vacate and dismiss the explosives and gun convictions against Brown, who was sentenced in 2023 and released from prison in February.</p>
<p>“The United States’ motion is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the second superseding indictment — and, derivatively, perforce the pardon, both the superseding indictment and the indictment — are dismissed with prejudice,” Merryday said. “The clerk must close the case.”</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/the-president-possesses-no-such-authority-lawsuit-pits-kavanaugh-against-5th-circuit-in-challenge-to-trumps-order-that-aims-to-dictate-new-rules-for-national-elections/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>More from Law&amp;Crime: ‘The president possesses no such authority’: Lawsuit pits Kavanaugh against 5th Circuit in challenge to Trump’s order that aims to ‘dictate’ new rules for national elections</strong></a></p>
<p>For his Jan. 6 case, Brown was accused of “unlawfully and knowingly” entering and remaining in a restricted building and grounds at the U.S. Capitol, <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25878306-jeremy-brown-information/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according to court documents</a>. He was charged in Washington, D.C., federal court with misdemeanor trespassing and disorderly conduct, with photos showing Brown donning military gear.</p>
<p>In Florida, Brown was found guilty after a jury trial in December 2022 of possession of unregistered short-barreled firearms, possession of unregistered explosive grenades, improper storage of explosive grenades, and retention of classified information.</p>
<p>According to evidence presented at his trial, the FBI executed an arrest and search warrant at Brown’s residence in Tampa on Sept. 30, 2021, and found an unregistered AR-15-style rifle — modified to have a 10-inch barrel — in Brown’s bedroom. Agents also allegedly found the sawed-off shotgun on a couch inside of Brown’s recreational vehicle, which was parked near his home.</p>
<p>“Inside a briefcase next to the shotgun, agents found a classified Trip Report that Brown had authored shortly before he retired from the U.S. Special Forces,” prosecutors said in an April 2023 press release. “Inside the bedroom of that same RV, agents found an ammunition vest containing two M-67 fragmentation grenades hidden in the pockets. U.S. Army records confirmed that the grenades had originally been in the possession of the U.S. Army.”</p>
<p>Prosecutors didn’t provide a specific reason in their February <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25877748-jeremy-browndoj-pardon-filing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">notice of filing Brown’s certificate of pardon</a> for why his weapons and explosives convictions were being thrown out, just that it was “based on consultation with Department of Justice leadership.”</p>
<p>Attempts by Law&amp;Crime to reach the DOJ for comment Wednesday were unsuccessful.</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/email-newsletter/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&amp;Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.</strong></a></p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/jan-6-defendant-who-got-busted-with-illegal-guns-and-army-grenades-gets-the-trump-pardon-treatment/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/jan-6-defendant-with-gun-grenade-case-gets-trump-pardon/">Jan. 6 defendant with gun, grenade case gets Trump pardon</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/jan-6-defendant-with-gun-grenade-case-gets-trump-pardon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Trump-and-Jeremy-Brown.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pardoned Jan. 6 defendant headed back to prison</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-defendant-headed-back-to-prison/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-defendant-headed-back-to-prison/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defendant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurrection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pardon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pardoned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-defendant-headed-back-to-prison/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Edwin Wilson is seen in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (U.S. Attorney’s Office). A pardoned Jan. 6 defendant from Kentucky is going back to prison to serve out his term for separate firearms convictions after he had been erroneously released from custody. Dan Edwin Wilson, 49, was ordered on Friday to self-surrender [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-defendant-headed-back-to-prison/">Pardoned Jan. 6 defendant headed back to prison</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_458746" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-458746" class="size-full wp-image-458746" src="https://am21.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2024/05/Daniel-Edwin-Wilson.jpg" alt="Daniel Edwin Wilson is seen in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (U.S. Attorney" s="" office="" width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-458746" class="wp-caption-text">Daniel Edwin Wilson is seen in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (U.S. Attorney’s Office).</p>
</div>
<p>A pardoned <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/?s=jan.+6" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6</a> defendant from <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/?s=Kentucky" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kentucky</a> is going back to prison to serve out his term for separate <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/?s=firearms" target="_blank" rel="noopener">firearms</a> convictions after he had been erroneously released from custody.</p>
<p>Dan Edwin Wilson, 49, was ordered on Friday to self-surrender to federal authorities to serve the remaining time of his 60-month — or five-year — sentence.</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich, a <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/?s=%22Donald+Trump%22" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> appointee, rejected his claim that the President’s pardon for his charge of conspiracy to impede or injure an officer at the Capitol also covered his separate convictions in Kentucky for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and possession of an unregistered firearm.</p>
<p>Like many other rioters, the defendant posted messages online about what he wanted to do in Washington, D.C., in the days leading up to Jan. 6.</p>
<p>“I am ready to lay my life on the line,” Wilson <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/i-am-a-gray-ghost-ranger-man-nicknamed-live-wire-admits-to-plotting-to-interfere-with-police-at-capitol-on-jan-6-after-saying-its-time-for-good-men-to-do-bad-things/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">declared on Dec. 27 in the encrypted messaging app Telegram.</a></p>
<p>“We are willing to work and coordinate with others, but I am a gray ghost ranger,” he wrote, referring to his affiliation with the so-called “Gray Ghost Militia.”</p>
<p>Wilson entered the Capitol that day wearing a gas mask and walked through the Rotunda and Statuary Hall before exiting at 2:49 p.m. He was inside for just over 10 minutes. He was arrested on May 25, 2023, almost a year after the federal search warrant was executed on his home.</p>
<p>On June 3, 2022, law enforcement seized six firearms stored in a backpack and cabinet in Wilson’s home, including some that were covered by clothing.</p>
<p>“Wilson was prohibited from possessing firearms at the time, due to previous felony convictions,” the probable cause affidavit notes. “At least two of the seized firearms were loaded at the time of seizure, and another two did not have serial numbers.”</p>
<p>The firearm charges were initially filed in Kentucky federal court but were later transferred to the District of Columbia, the FBI says.</p>
<p>Wilson was sentenced on Aug. 28, 2024.</p>
<p>Around Inauguration Day on Jan. 20, when Trump issued his Executive Order granting pardons to Jan. 6 defendants, Wilson was erroneously released from prison, authorities said.</p>
<p>Then, he was ordered to return to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, and his defense counsel filed a motion to stay his return, which the government did not oppose.</p>
<p>“The government has reviewed the Certificate of Pardon, which was provided to the defendant by the Office of the Pardon Attorney on or about January 29, 2025,” prosecutors wrote in court documents. “The Certificate makes clear that the pardon only applies to ‘convictions for offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.&#8217;”</p>
<p>The firearm convictions, they added, “did not occur at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, and thus, by the plain language of the certificate, the pardon does not extend to these convictions. The defendant should be returned to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons.”</p>
<p><em>Marisa Sarnoff contributed to this report.</em></p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/pardoned-jan-6-defendant-is-going-back-to-prison-for-separate-firearms-convictions-after-he-was-erroneously-released/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-defendant-headed-back-to-prison/">Pardoned Jan. 6 defendant headed back to prison</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-defendant-headed-back-to-prison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Daniel-Edwin-Wilson.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ won&#8217;t share names of FBI agents who worked Jan. 6 cases</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-wont-share-names-of-fbi-agents-who-worked-jan-6-cases/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-wont-share-names-of-fbi-agents-who-worked-jan-6-cases/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 20:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worked]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-wont-share-names-of-fbi-agents-who-worked-jan-6-cases/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Main: President Donald Trump speaks during a rally protesting the electoral college certification of Joe Biden as President in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021 (AP Photo/Evan Vucci). Inset: Trump supporters listening to him speak as they rally in Washington before the attack on the U.S. Capitol (AP Photo/Evan Vucci). The federal government has agreed not to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-wont-share-names-of-fbi-agents-who-worked-jan-6-cases/">DOJ won&#8217;t share names of FBI agents who worked Jan. 6 cases</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_429071" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-429071" class="size-full wp-image-429071" src="https://am22.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2023/12/Donald-Trump-Confederate-flag-Gadsden-flag.jpg" alt="" width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-429071" class="wp-caption-text">Main: President Donald Trump speaks during a rally protesting the electoral college certification of Joe Biden as President in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021 (AP Photo/Evan Vucci). Inset: Trump supporters listening to him speak as they rally in Washington before the attack on the U.S. Capitol (AP Photo/Evan Vucci).</p>
</div>
<p>The federal government has agreed not to share a <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/who-do-i-have-to-get-in-here-doj-cant-guarantee-list-of-fbi-agents-who-investigated-jan-6-cases-wont-be-publicly-released/">recently compiled list</a> identifying the FBI agents and analysts who worked on investigations into the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.</p>
<p>The agreement was reached Friday morning, just before the DOJ was scheduled to appear in court and defend against a federal lawsuit filed anonymously earlier this week by a group of agents who feared the information would be used by President <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/donald-trump/">Donald Trump</a> as part of <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/personify-the-vengeance-trump-seeks-to-exact-revenge-on-fbi-agents-who-investigated-him-lawsuit-claims/">his promise to “exact revenge”</a> on those who investigated him.</p>
<p>Following a <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/who-do-i-have-to-get-in-here-doj-cant-guarantee-list-of-fbi-agents-who-investigated-jan-6-cases-wont-be-publicly-released/">protracted hearing</a> on the matter Thursday, the two sides came to an understanding regarding a consent agreement that requires the federal government to provide the plaintiffs with at least two days notice before they can share the list with the public.</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>“The Government will not disseminate the list at issue in these consolidated cases (and any subsequent versions of that list, including any record pairing the unique identifiers on the list to names) to the public, directly or indirectly, before the Court rules on Plaintiffs’ anticipated motions for a preliminary injunction,” U.S. District Judge Jia M. Cobb wrote in the <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277085/gov.uscourts.dcd.277085.14.0.pdf">one-page order</a>. “Absent further order of the Court, the Government may terminate the proscription set forth in Paragraph 1 at its election by providing two business days’ notice to the parties and the Court of its intent to terminate.”</p>
<p>Attorneys for the anonymous group of FBI agents on Tuesday <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/personify-the-vengeance-trump-seeks-to-exact-revenge-on-fbi-agents-who-investigated-him-lawsuit-claims/">filed a pair of lawsuits</a> — which have since been consolidated — seeking a temporary restraining order prohibiting the government from sharing the list, claiming that the Trump administration would unlawfully use the information to conduct mass firings at the bureau in retaliation for the agents’ work. The agents also asserted that sharing the list publicly would put them in danger of “imminent harm” from the president’s most ardent supporters, particularly <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/galvanized-and-ready-family-members-of-jan-6-rioters-and-their-victims-say-theyre-terrified-of-whats-to-come-now-that-trump-pardons-actually-happened/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the violent felons he pardoned</a> for their roles in the Capitol riot.</p>
<p>The suits were filed after agents on Monday were directed to fill out surveys identifying the roles they played in the Mar-a-Lago and Jan. 6 cases, with the aggregated information being forwarded to “upper management” at the DOJ. The three-page survey was included as <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277085/gov.uscourts.dcd.277085.1.1.pdf">an exhibit in one of the filings and included 13 questions about the agents’ work</a>.</p>
<p>“What was your/your employee’s title when you/your employee participated in investigation(s) or prosecution(s) of events that occurred at or near the US Capitol on January 6, 2021?” read one of the questions.</p>
<p>“What was your/your employee’s role in the investigation(s) or prosecution(s) relating to events that occurred at or near the US Capitol on January 6, 2021? Select all that apply,” read another.</p>
<p>The agents claim the survey is part of a directive issued by Trump instructing the DOJ to “conduct a review and purge” of FBI personnel involved in the aforementioned investigations and prosecutions, placing them in danger of losing their jobs or, worse, being targeted by any of the more than 1,200 convicted rioters Trump <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/cannot-whitewash-the-blood-trump-jan-6-judge-hammers-presidents-decision-to-absolve-capitol-rioters/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">went on to pardon</a> his first day in office.</p>
<p>“Plaintiffs assert that the purpose for this list is to identify agents to be terminated or to suffer other adverse employment action,” <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25512982-7ff33f2b-02c8-4b80-90f7-67482ca4fed4/">one of the complaints</a> stated. “Plaintiffs reasonably fear that all or parts of this list might be published by allies of President Trump, thus placing themselves and their families in immediate danger of retribution by the now pardoned and at-large Jan. 6 convicted felons.”</p>
<p>During Thursday’s hearing, the Justice Department said it would agree to enter into a temporary consent agreement representing that it would not disseminate the information to the public, but could not make the same guarantee about the rest of the federal government. That did not quell concerns from attorneys representing the FBI agents.</p>
<p>“We are one step away from the [agents’] names being released,” attorneys for the plaintiffs said, a sentiment that was repeated multiple times throughout the proceedings. The plaintiffs’ attorneys went through multiple examples of the Trump administration and Elon Musk releasing the names of public servants they had either ousted or sought to oust in the short time they have been in power and continued to insist that an agreement that only bound the DOJ was insufficient.</p>
<p>“We don’t have assurances that DOGE does not have access to DOJ systems,” one of the plaintiff’s attorneys said. “We don’t have assurances other nongovernment persons operating within DOJ would not immediately release those names.”</p>
<p>Referring to the Jan. 6 convicts who had been granted pardons, plaintiff attorney Mark Zaid told the court that at least one individual had already “threatened to kill the agents who worked on their case.”</p>
<p>Another attorney for the plaintiffs argued it would be a “big problem” if “the list made its way to Musk” before the court could stop the information from getting out, saying, “the risk to these agents is horrendous.”</p>
<p>The DOJ pushed back on the plaintiffs’ claims, repeatedly emphasizing that the “imminent harm” of having their information publicly exposed was entirely “speculative” and therefore could not be the basis for the court issuing an order that encompassed the entirety of the federal government.</p>
<p>“Plaintiffs can point to nothing that suggests the Government intends to make public the list in this case,” DOJ attorneys wrote in a Thursday court filing. “To the contrary, the Department and FBI management have repeatedly stressed the purpose of the list is to conduct an internal review, not expose dedicated special agents to public insult or ridicule.”</p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/risk-to-these-agents-is-horrendous-trump-administration-wont-release-names-of-fbi-personnel-who-worked-jan-6-attack-cases-for-now/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-wont-share-names-of-fbi-agents-who-worked-jan-6-cases/">DOJ won&#8217;t share names of FBI agents who worked Jan. 6 cases</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-wont-share-names-of-fbi-agents-who-worked-jan-6-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Donald-Trump-Confederate-flag-Gadsden-flag.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ can&#8217;t guarantee Jan. 6 FBI agents won&#8217;t be exposed</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-cant-guarantee-jan-6-fbi-agents-wont-be-exposed/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-cant-guarantee-jan-6-fbi-agents-wont-be-exposed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guarantee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wont]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-cant-guarantee-jan-6-fbi-agents-wont-be-exposed/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FILE — President Donald Trump throws pens used to sign executive orders to the crowd during an indoor Presidential Inauguration parade event in Washington, Monday, Jan. 20, 2025 (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File). Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday said they could not guarantee that the recently compiled list identifying the FBI employees [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-cant-guarantee-jan-6-fbi-agents-wont-be-exposed/">DOJ can&#8217;t guarantee Jan. 6 FBI agents won&#8217;t be exposed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_505354" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-505354" class="size-full wp-image-505354" src="https://am22.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/02/AP25031812120776-1.jpg" alt="Donald Trump throws sign pens to a crowd." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-505354" class="wp-caption-text">FILE — President Donald Trump throws pens used to sign executive orders to the crowd during an indoor Presidential Inauguration parade event in Washington, Monday, Jan. 20, 2025 (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File).</p>
</div>
<p>Attorneys for the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/DOJ/">U.S. Department of Justice</a> on Thursday said they could not guarantee that the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/personify-the-vengeance-trump-seeks-to-exact-revenge-on-fbi-agents-who-investigated-him-lawsuit-claims/">recently compiled list</a> identifying the FBI employees involved in the investigation into the Jan. 6, attack on the Capitol would not be <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/insubordination-acting-head-of-fbi-refused-to-comply-with-order-to-identify-jan-6-agents-from-ex-trump-defense-attorney-at-doj/">publicly released</a> by other entities or agencies of the federal government.</p>
<p>Appearing in federal court in Washington, D.C., the DOJ told U.S. District Judge Jia M. Cobb that the information on the agents had not been “officially disseminated” outside of the department — meaning it had not been given to the White House and President Donald Trump or provided to the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk — but was unable to assure the court that it would not be shared at all with other federal departments.</p>
<p>The proceedings stemmed from a pair of lawsuits filed earlier this week alleging that the Trump administration appeared to be planning a “purge” of the FBI’s case agents based on assignments that “upset” the president and possibly releasing identifying information about the agents publicly, which would expose them to potential harm from the approximately 1,500 convicted rioters pardoned by Trump immediately after taking office.</p>
<p>Shortly before the hearing began, the DOJ filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order prohibiting the dissemination of information, asserting that the department was simply commencing a “review process” in conjunction with President Trump’s executive order seeking to end what he referred to as “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-the-weaponization-of-the-federal-government/">the weaponization of the federal government</a>.”</p>
<p>During the hearing, the Justice Department said it would agree to enter into a temporary consent agreement representing that it would not disseminate the information to the public, but could not make the same guarantee about the rest of the federal government. That did not quell concerns from attorneys representing the FBI agents seeking to prohibit the release of the information due to fear of professional retaliation or physical harm.</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>“We are one step away from the [agents’] names being released,” attorneys for the plaintiffs said, a sentiment that was repeated multiple times throughout the proceedings. The plaintiffs’ attorneys went through multiple examples of the Trump administration and Musk releasing the names of public servants they had either ousted or sought to oust in the short time they’ve been in power and continued to insist that an agreement that only bound the DOJ was insufficient.</p>
<p>“We don’t have assurances that DOGE does not have access to DOJ systems,” one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys said. “We don’t have assurances other nongovernment persons operating within DOJ would not immediately release those names.”</p>
<p>Referring to the Jan. 6 convicts who had been granted pardons, plaintiff attorney Mark Zaid told the court that at least one individual had already “threatened to kill the agents who worked on their case.”</p>
<p>Another attorney for the plaintiffs argued it would be a “big problem” if “the list made its way to Musk” before the court could stop the information from getting out.</p>
<p>Cobb, who repeatedly told the parties that she understood how difficult it was to argue their cases on such an abbreviated timeline, seemed slightly perturbed by the DOJ’s inability to speak for the entire federal government, pointing out that it was one of the named defendants and thus a party to the case.</p>
<p>At one point, the DOJ’s attorney said he could not “make representations for the government as a whole” regarding the dissemination of the agents’ information and Cobb responded by asking, “If not you, then who do I have to get in here?”</p>
<p>The DOJ pushed back on the plaintiffs’ claims, repeatedly emphasizing that the “imminent harm” of having their information publicly exposed was entirely “speculative” and therefore could not be the basis for the court issuing an order that encompassed the entirety of the federal government.</p>
<p>Plaintiffs’ attorneys responded by asking the court to prohibit dissemination of the information in the short term, noting that the DOJ had already said on the record that it had no plans to share the information or release it publicly. According to the plaintiffs, that meant the government would suffer no harm in agreeing that it would remain within the department.</p>
<p>The proceedings were paused several times as the DOJ reached out to — and at times successfully got in touch with — “decision makers” who could authorize a broader agreement regarding the safekeeping of the agents’ information. Ultimately, the two sides agreed to return to court again on Friday to continue discussions.</p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/who-do-i-have-to-get-in-here-doj-cant-guarantee-list-of-fbi-agents-who-investigated-jan-6-cases-wont-be-publicly-released/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-cant-guarantee-jan-6-fbi-agents-wont-be-exposed/">DOJ can&#8217;t guarantee Jan. 6 FBI agents won&#8217;t be exposed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-cant-guarantee-jan-6-fbi-agents-wont-be-exposed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/AP25031812120776-1.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pardoned Jan. 6 rioter behind bars for child solicitation</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-behind-bars-for-child-solicitation/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-behind-bars-for-child-solicitation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrested]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitol riot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6 attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6 capitol attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pardon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pardoned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rioter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-behind-bars-for-child-solicitation/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Left: Andrew Taake. Right: Taake seen holding a whip during a confrontation at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (via FBI court filing). A Jan. 6 rioter from Texas who got hit with an arrest warrant for online solicitation of a minor after being pardoned by President Donald Trump is back behind bars after [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-behind-bars-for-child-solicitation/">Pardoned Jan. 6 rioter behind bars for child solicitation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_429132" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-429132" class="size-full wp-image-429132" src="https://am24.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2023/12/Andrew-Taake.jpg" alt="Left: Andrew Taake. Right: Taake seen holding a whip during a confrontation at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (via FBI court filing)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-429132" class="wp-caption-text">Left: Andrew Taake. Right: Taake seen holding a whip during a confrontation at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (via FBI court filing).</p>
</div>
<p>A <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/jan-6/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6</a> rioter from Texas who got hit with an <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/jan-6-rioter-pardoned-by-trump-wanted-on-child-solicitation-charge-for-allegedly-trying-to-meet-up-with-minor-after-multiple-explicit-messages/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">arrest warrant for online solicitation of a minor</a> after being pardoned by President <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/donald-trump/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> is back behind bars after being busted Thursday following a surveillance operation, cops say.</p>
<p>Andrew Taake, 36, was taken into custody by the Harris County District Attorney’s Fugitive Apprehension squad with help from multiple law enforcement agencies after a warrant was issued for his arrest late last month, according to prosecutors. Taake was caught in Leon County, Texas, and must now face justice in Houston for a 2016 charge of online solicitation of a minor. He was on pretrial release when the 2021 Capitol attack unfolded, which landed him a six-year prison sentence for attacking police officers with a metal whip and dousing them in bear spray.</p>
<p>Taake pleaded guilty in December 2023 to one count of assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers using a dangerous weapon. Last month, Trump scrubbed away the charge with a <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/i-got-a-pardon-baby-the-qanon-shaman-says-hes-going-to-buy-some-motha-f-kin-guns-after-trumps-mass-jan-6-pardon/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">“full, complete and unconditional” pardon</a> of Taake and his roughly 1,500 fellow rioters. Prosecutors in Harris County took up the solicitation charge — now that his federal case is no longer active — as a result.</p>
<p>“Re-arresting individuals, like Taake, who were released with pending State warrants, will require significant resources,” District Attorney Sean Teare said in a statement before Taake’s arrest. “Know that we are already in the process of tracking Taake down, as he must answer for 2016 charge of soliciting a minor online.”</p>
<p>According to prosecutors, Taake was apprehended Thursday after a surveillance operation on Tuesday confirmed he was staying at a residence in Leon County.</p>
<p>“We would like to thank the coordinated efforts of our office’s Fugitive Apprehension Section, Leon County Sheriff’s Office, and Texas Department of Public Safety for their diligence in getting this suspected child predator back into custody,” Teare said in a statement.</p>
<p>Taake <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-siege/woman-on-bumble-dating-app-helped-fbi-catch-suspect-who-allegedly-beat-officers-with-metal-whip-during-jan-6th-capitol-siege-court-documents/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">made headlines</a> at the time of his Jan. 6 arrest after he was turned in by a woman he met on the dating app Bumble. He <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/metal-whip-wielding-jan-6-rioter-who-was-busted-by-his-would-be-bumble-date-learns-his-fate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">was sentenced to 74 months</a> in prison last year — followed by 36 months of supervised release — in addition to paying $2,000 in restitution.</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/galvanized-and-ready-family-members-of-jan-6-rioters-and-their-victims-say-theyre-terrified-of-whats-to-come-now-that-trump-pardons-actually-happened/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>More from Law&amp;Crime: ‘Galvanized and ready’: Family members of Jan. 6 rioters and their victims say they’re ‘terrified’ of what’s to come now that Trump pardons actually happened</strong></a></p>
<p>According to the <a href="https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/crime/article/andrew-taake-jan-6-wanted-solicitation-20051863.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Houston Chronicle</a>, Taake was allegedly soliciting a person in 2016 who he “believed to be younger than 17 years of age.” He was 27 at the time.</p>
<p>Authorities say Taake talked on social media with an undercover cop posing as a 15-year-old girl. He allegedly sent “multiple explicit messages” and asked to meet up with her — even admitting that he “could go to jail” if anyone found out what he was doing. Taake allegedly went to an address that the undercover provided and cops arrested him. If convicted, he faces a decade in prison.</p>
<p><em>David Harris contributed to this report.</em></p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/trump-pardoned-jan-6-rioter-who-allegedly-tried-to-meet-up-with-minor-is-now-behind-bars-after-getting-hit-with-warrant-for-child-solicitation/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-behind-bars-for-child-solicitation/">Pardoned Jan. 6 rioter behind bars for child solicitation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-behind-bars-for-child-solicitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Andrew-Taake.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ accuses FBI of insubordination over Jan. 6 requests</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-accuses-fbi-of-insubordination-over-jan-6-requests/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-accuses-fbi-of-insubordination-over-jan-6-requests/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 07:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insubordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requests]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-accuses-fbi-of-insubordination-over-jan-6-requests/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Emil Bove exiting the New York State appellate court, Monday, April 8, 2024, in New York (AP Photo/Peter K. Afriyie). The current acting second in command at the Department of Justice — who until recently was President Donald Trump’s criminal defense attorney — is accusing the acting FBI director of “insubordination” for “refusing to comply” [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-accuses-fbi-of-insubordination-over-jan-6-requests/">DOJ accuses FBI of insubordination over Jan. 6 requests</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_506191" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-506191" class="size-full wp-image-506191" src="https://am23.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/02/Emil-Bove-exiting-the-New-York-State-appellate-court-Monday-April-8-2024-in-New-York-AP-PhotoPeter-K.-Afriyie.jpg" alt="Emil Bove exiting the New York State appellate court, Monday, April 8, 2024, in New York (AP Photo/Peter K. Afriyie)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-506191" class="wp-caption-text">Emil Bove exiting the New York State appellate court, Monday, April 8, 2024, in New York (AP Photo/Peter K. Afriyie).</p>
</div>
<p>The current acting second in command at the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/DOJ/">Department of Justice</a> — who until recently was President <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/donald-trump/">Donald Trump’s</a> criminal defense attorney — is accusing the acting FBI director of “insubordination” for “refusing to comply” with an order to provide the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/personify-the-vengeance-trump-seeks-to-exact-revenge-on-fbi-agents-who-investigated-him-lawsuit-claims/">names of bureau employees</a> who headed up the investigations into the Jan. 6, attack on the Capitol.</p>
<p>In a <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25513971-bove-memo/">memo sent Wednesday</a>, interim Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove III said that last week he had asked acting FBI head Brian J. Driscoll and his deputy, Robert C. Kissane “multiple times” to identify the “core team” in Washington, D.C., that was “responsible for the investigation relating to events on January 6, 2021.”</p>
<p>Driscoll and Kissane have steadfastly refused to comply with the demand as <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/personify-the-vengeance-trump-seeks-to-exact-revenge-on-fbi-agents-who-investigated-him-lawsuit-claims/">multiple class action lawsuits</a> have been filed by current agents who fear that the Trump administration will “purge” the bureau’s ranks of those perceived insufficiently loyal to the president. Even worse, several complaints filed in criminal court allege that the identifying information could be published, allowing the agents to be targeted by any of the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/i-got-a-pardon-baby-the-qanon-shaman-says-hes-going-to-buy-some-motha-f-kin-guns-after-trumps-mass-jan-6-pardon/">roughly 1,500 convicted rioters Trump went on to pardon</a> on his first day in office.</p>
<p>In the memo, Bove said he requested the information so the Justice Department could “conduct a review” of the agents and their conduct in connection with Trump’s executive order seeking to “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-the-weaponization-of-the-federal-government/">end the weaponization of the federal government</a>.”</p>
<p>“FBI acting leadership refused to comply,” he wrote in the memo.</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>According to Bove, that refusal to follow his directive forced him to seek the names of all the agents who worked on investigations into the Capitol riot, which includes about 5,000 of the bureau’s 38,000 agents.</p>
<p>“That insubordination necessitated, among other things, the directive in my January 31, 2025 memo to identify all agents assigned to investigations relating to January 6, 2021,” he wrote.</p>
<p>In one of the several federal lawsuits seeking to block the Justice Department from using or publishing any list of agents who worked on the investigation, the plaintiff agents said they had to fill out a <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277085/gov.uscourts.dcd.277085.1.1.pdf">survey questioning them about their work at the bureau</a>.</p>
<p>“What was your/your employee’s title when you/your employee participated in investigation(s) or prosecution(s) of events that occurred at or near the US Capitol on January 6, 2021?” read one of the questions.</p>
<p>“What was your/your employee’s role in the investigation(s) or prosecution(s) relating to events that occurred at or near the US Capitol on January 6, 2021? Select all that apply,” read another.</p>
<p>The agents alleged that the survey was part of a directive issued by Trump instructing the DOJ to “conduct a review and purge” of FBI personnel as rumors of mass firings swirled in Washington. The agents’ fear of reprisal from the administration appears to be well-founded as the Justice Department on Friday terminated all of the prosecutors involved in the federal criminal cases brought against Trump (which were later dropped due to long-standing DOJ policy against prosecuting a sitting president).</p>
<p>However, Bove sought to disabuse agents fearing retribution for simply carrying out the tasks assigned to them by their superiors.</p>
<p>“Let me be clear: No FBI employee who simply followed orders and carried out their duties in an ethical manner with respect to January 6 investigations is at risk of termination or other penalties,” he wrote. “The only individuals who should be concerned about the process initiated by my January 31, 2025 memo are those who acted with corrupt or partisan intent, who blatantly defied orders from Department leadership, or who exercised discretion in weaponizing the FBI. There is no honor in the ongoing efforts to distort that simple truth or protect culpable actors from scrutiny on these issues, which have politicized the Bureau, harmed its credibility, and distracted the public from the excellent work being done every day.”</p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/insubordination-acting-head-of-fbi-refused-to-comply-with-order-to-identify-jan-6-agents-from-ex-trump-defense-attorney-at-doj/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-accuses-fbi-of-insubordination-over-jan-6-requests/">DOJ accuses FBI of insubordination over Jan. 6 requests</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/doj-accuses-fbi-of-insubordination-over-jan-6-requests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Emil-Bove-exiting-the-New-York-State-appellate-court-Monday-April-8-2024-in-New-York-AP-PhotoPeter-K.-Afriyie.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deletion of Jan. 6 database violates federal law: CREW</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 10:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deletion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6 capitol attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violates]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Left: Jan. 6 rioters during the 2021 Capitol attack (Department of Justice). Right: President-elect Donald Trump arrives to speak at a meeting of the House GOP conference, Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon). The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a federal watchdog group, has penned an open letter to the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/">Deletion of Jan. 6 database violates federal law: CREW</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_500398" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-500398" class="size-full wp-image-500398" src="https://am22.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/01/TrumpJan.-6.jpg" alt="Left: Jan. 6 rioters during the 2021 Capitol attack (Department of Justice). Right: President-elect Donald Trump arrives to speak at a meeting of the House GOP conference, Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-500398" class="wp-caption-text">Left: Jan. 6 rioters during the 2021 Capitol attack (Department of Justice). Right: President-elect Donald Trump arrives to speak at a meeting of the House GOP conference, Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).</p>
</div>
<p>The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/alito-harmed-our-democracy-watchdog-demands-scotus-create-ethics-code-enforcement-mechanism-to-investigate-crisis-after-justice-flew-far-right-conspiracy-theory-flags/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">federal watchdog</a> group, has penned an open letter to the Inspector General of the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/as-a-result-of-the-election-jack-smith-is-calling-it-quits-in-jan-6-case-against-trump-cites-department-of-justice-policy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Department of Justice</a> and the Archivist of the United States, urging them to “take action” and investigate the DOJ’s removal of its <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/traitors-get-shot-capitol-rioter-who-lit-the-match-on-jan-6-ordered-to-stay-away-from-son-who-turned-him-in-and-is-terrified-of-his-dad-retaliating/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6</a> database — detailing criminal charges and convictions related to the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/jan-6-capitol-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2021 Capitol attack</a> — which they call a “likely violation” of federal law.</p>
<p>“The Department of Justice’s removal of this vital information about its prosecutions arising from the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol is consistent with President Trump’s ongoing efforts to rewrite or erase the insurrection,” the <a href="https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Letter-to-Archivist-DOJ-IG-re-J6-Website-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CREW letter</a> reads. “We request that you promptly investigate this matter and take appropriate corrective action if necessary.”</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>The DOJ’s database removal first came to light last week after <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/trump-secures-25-million-settlement-from-meta-and-mark-zuckerberg-over-first-amendment-lawsuit-ridiculed-by-legal-experts/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">President Donald Trump</a> issued his <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/galvanized-and-ready-family-members-of-jan-6-rioters-and-their-victims-say-theyre-terrified-of-whats-to-come-now-that-trump-pardons-actually-happened/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6 pardons</a> on his first day in office, with <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/25/politics/january-6-justice-department-database/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CNN</a> reporting Sunday that only parts of the database were still accessible through the Internet Archive, while everything else was scrubbed clean.</p>
<p>“This is a huge victory for J6ers,” <a href="https://x.com/BrandonStraka/status/1883210738472251808" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a> pardoned Jan. 6 rioter Brandon Straka on X.</p>
<p>“This site was one of countless weapons of harassment used by the federal government to make life impossible for its targets from J6,” Straka said. “The site included every accusation, and every charge leveled against people, including the ones they were not convicted of and were never substantiated in court, and would appear as the top ranking search result. In other words, every time a potential employer, landlord, new social or business contact, etc, would search somebody targeted for J6 they would read a dossier on each person filled with FBI and FOJ accusations and narratives that were never proven, along with links to documents with even more damaging allegations.”</p>
<p>According to CREW’s letter, removing the Jan. 6 database appears to be a violation of <a href="https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2018-title44/USCODE-2018-title44-chap31-sec3106" target="_blank" rel="noopener">44 U.S.C. § 3106</a> — the unlawful removal or destruction of records — which requires the head of each federal agency to notify the Archivist of the United States of “any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, corruption, deletion, erasure, or other destruction of records in the custody of the agency,” per CREW.</p>
<p>“Implementing this requirement, NARA regulations provide that an “agency must report promptly any unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records in the custody of that agency to NARA,&#8221;” the group’s letter says. “The regulations also specify certain details the agency ‘must include’ in its report to NARA. The knowing and willful destruction of federal records is a crime punishable by fines and up to three years of imprisonment.”</p>
<p>CREW claims that the Jan. 6 database “clearly qualifies as a federal record” as it documented the DOJ’s functions and decisions related to investigations and prosecutions related to the 2021 Capitol attack.</p>
<p>“The database must be managed as a federal record and its deletion is subject to the § 3106 notice requirements,” the letter to the DOJ says. “Despite the agency’s requirement to notify the archivist of the deletion of these records, there is no indication that they reported this matter to NARA, and a list of open ‘unauthorized disposition cases’ on NARA’s website does not reveal any such reporting.”</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/what-i-did-was-ungodly-jan-6-rioter-who-caused-deadly-dui-crash-while-driving-drunk-on-wrong-side-of-highway-goes-from-pardon-to-prison/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">More from Law&amp;Crime: ‘What I did was ungodly’: Jan. 6 rioter who caused deadly DUI crash while driving drunk on wrong side of highway goes from pardon to prison</a></strong></p>
<p>While there may not be an online record anymore, at least one Jan. 6 judge — Bill Clinton appointee <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/clear-and-compelling-interest-judge-orders-army-to-expedite-records-about-trumps-controversial-visit-to-arlington-national-cemetery/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Paul Friedman</a> — has decided to take matters into his own hands by creating his own 138-page list of Capitol riot defendants, which he attached to his most recent ruling granting a DOJ dismissal to rioter <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/active-duty-marine-corps-major-arrested-at-quantico-for-allegedly-assaulting-officer-during-capitol-siege/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Christopher Warnagiris</a>.</p>
<p>“Department of Justice chart documenting sentences in Capitol breach cases,” the list’s title reads.</p>
<p>In addition to the DOJ database, the FBI’s online record of individuals who were still wanted in connection with Jan. 6 also no longer exists. Attempts by Law&amp;Crime to reach the DOJ and FBI for comment on Thursday were unsuccessful.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/efforts-to-erase-the-insurrection-deletion-of-jan-6-database-by-trump-administration-appears-to-violate-federal-law-watchdog-says/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/">Deletion of Jan. 6 database violates federal law: CREW</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/deletion-of-jan-6-database-violates-federal-law-crew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/TrumpJan.-6.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pardoned Jan. 6 rioter gets 10 years for deadly DUI crash</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-gets-10-years-for-deadly-dui-crash/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-gets-10-years-for-deadly-dui-crash/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pardon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pardoned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rioter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. capitol attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Years]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-gets-10-years-for-deadly-dui-crash/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Background: Emily Hernandez arriving at court in Franklin County, Missouri (KSDK/YouTube). Inset: Emily Hernandez at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot (Department of Justice) A Jan. 6 rioter from Missouri who made headlines for swiping Nancy Pelosi’s name plate during the Capitol attack went from pardon to prison this week as she was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-gets-10-years-for-deadly-dui-crash/">Pardoned Jan. 6 rioter gets 10 years for deadly DUI crash</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_504787" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-504787" class="size-full wp-image-504787" src="https://am21.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/01/Emily-Hernandez.jpg" alt="Background: Emily Hernandez arriving at court in Franklin County, Missouri (KSDK/YouTube). Inset: Emily Hernandez at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot (Department of Justice). " width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-504787" class="wp-caption-text">Background: Emily Hernandez arriving at court in Franklin County, Missouri (KSDK/YouTube). Inset: Emily Hernandez at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot (Department of Justice)</p>
</div>
<p>A <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/traitors-get-shot-capitol-rioter-who-lit-the-match-on-jan-6-ordered-to-stay-away-from-son-who-turned-him-in-and-is-terrified-of-his-dad-retaliating/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jan. 6</a> rioter from <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/crime/at-first-she-was-very-nice-mom-in-custody-dispute-with-fathers-of-her-children-decides-to-shoot-both-of-them-and-then-turns-herself-in-cops-say/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Missouri</a> who made headlines for <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-siege/missouri-resident-charged-as-woman-who-stole-nancy-pelosis-name-plate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">swiping Nancy Pelosi’s name plate</a> during the Capitol attack went from pardon to prison this week as she was sentenced Wednesday for <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-siege/missouri-woman-22-who-allegedly-stole-pelosis-name-plate-on-jan-6-is-now-charged-in-deadly-drunk-driving-crash/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">causing a fatal crash</a> while driving drunk on the wrong side of the highway.</p>
<p>Emily Hernandez, 25, got hit with a 10-year sentence by Franklin County Judge Ryan Helfrich for the death of 32-year-old Victoria Wilson on Jan. 5, 2022, according to the<a href="https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-courts/emily-hernandez-pardoned-for-capitol-riot-sentenced-to-10-years-in-fatal-dwi-crash/article_bf4def6e-de51-11ef-a3a0-97de6fd4bd53.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> St. Louis Post-Dispatch</a> and local NBC affiliate <a href="https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/crime/emily-hernandez-sentenced-deadly-dui-crash/63-0d47bef0-2d31-4eb7-9aec-9a8e77a68b3c" target="_blank" rel="noopener">KSDK</a>. She received 10 years and another seven years for injuring Wilson’s husband, Ryan E. Wilson — who was riding with her that night — with the sentences to be served concurrently.</p>
<p>“No matter how loud I cried out to her, I couldn’t wake her,” Wilson said in court Wednesday, where he reportedly used a cane to walk due to the severity of his injuries, per the Post-Dispatch. “I couldn’t reach her because of the air bags.”</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>According to her <a href="https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/Emily%20Hernandez%20Statement%20of%20Facts.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">criminal complaint</a>, Hernandez was driving drunk on the wrong side of the highway during the fatal crash that killed Wilson and injured her husband. The crash happened just after 7 p.m., with their cars colliding in the eastbound lane of I-44.</p>
<p>Hernandez had a blood-alcohol content of .20% when tested after the crash, more than double the legal limit.</p>
<p>“What I did was ungodly and I will live with that shame for the rest of my life,” Hernandez said at her sentencing, according to the Post-Dispatch. “I am sorry for what I did and if I could take it all back, I would.”</p>
<p>Victoria Wilson’s family told KSDK after the court proceeding that while it’s nice to see justice be served, there’s “an empty hole” in their hearts that will never be filled.</p>
<p>“Nothing will bring her back,” said Victoria’s mom, Tonie Donaldson. “It was some relief to be able to turn and look her in her eyes and tell her how much harm she had really done to us … that’s a choice she made, she has to live with it.”</p>
<p>Hernandez, who pleaded guilty to the drunk driving incident, was pardoned by President Donald Trump last week on his first day in office — along with other rioters — after she <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-breach/missouri-woman-accused-in-fatal-drunk-driving-collision-pleads-guilty-to-jan-6-misdemeanor/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pleaded guilty</a> in January 2022 to a misdemeanor for entering the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6.</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/jan-6-rioter-pardoned-by-trump-wanted-on-child-solicitation-charge-for-allegedly-trying-to-meet-up-with-minor-after-multiple-explicit-messages/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">More from Law&amp;Crime: Jan. 6 rioter pardoned by Trump wanted on child solicitation charge for allegedly trying to meet up with minor after ‘multiple explicit messages’</a></strong></p>
<p>After the attack, Hernandez was seen in pictures and on video grinning while holding a fragment of a sign appearing to identify Pelosi’s office. She pleaded guilty to one count of entering and remaining in a restricted building after originally being charged with disorderly conduct, disruptive conduct in the Capitol, one count of parading, demonstrating, or picketing in the Capitol building, and “steal[ing], sell[ing], convey[ing] or dispos[ing] of any thing of value of the United States.”</p>
<p>The fatal crash that claimed Victoria Wilson’s life happened just six days before Hernandez was scheduled to plead guilty. She was given a 30-day jail sentence for the Jan. 6 charge.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/what-i-did-was-ungodly-jan-6-rioter-who-caused-deadly-dui-crash-while-driving-drunk-on-wrong-side-of-highway-goes-from-pardon-to-prison/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-gets-10-years-for-deadly-dui-crash/">Pardoned Jan. 6 rioter gets 10 years for deadly DUI crash</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-gets-10-years-for-deadly-dui-crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Emily-Hernandez.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Trump ethics lawyer&#8217;s Jan. 6 Committee lawsuit dismissed</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/ex-trump-ethics-lawyers-jan-6-committee-lawsuit-dismissed/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/ex-trump-ethics-lawyers-jan-6-committee-lawsuit-dismissed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 14:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismissed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exTrump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan. 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/ex-trump-ethics-lawyers-jan-6-committee-lawsuit-dismissed/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Stefan Passantino appearing on The Tucker Carlson Show in November 2024 (YouTube). A federal judge in Georgia has tossed out a lawsuit filed by a former Trump White House ethics lawyer accusing members of the House Committee to Investigate Jan. 6 of civil conspiracy and invasion of privacy in connection with their investigation into the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/ex-trump-ethics-lawyers-jan-6-committee-lawsuit-dismissed/">Ex-Trump ethics lawyer&#8217;s Jan. 6 Committee lawsuit dismissed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_503881" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-503881" class="size-full wp-image-503881" src="https://am24.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/01/Stefan-Passantino-appearing-on-The-Tucker-Carlson-Show-in-November-2024-YouTube.jpg" alt="Stefan Passantino appearing on The Tucker Carlson Show in November 2024 (YouTube)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-503881" class="wp-caption-text">Stefan Passantino appearing on The Tucker Carlson Show in November 2024 (YouTube).</p>
</div>
<p>A federal judge in <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/georgia/">Georgia</a> has tossed out a lawsuit filed by a former <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/donald-trump/">Trump</a> White House ethics lawyer <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/jan-6-committee/lawyers-want-donald-trump-ethics-lawyers-who-represented-former-white-house-aide-before-jan-6-committee-disbarred/">accusing members of the House Committee to Investigate Jan. 6</a> of civil conspiracy and invasion of privacy in connection with their investigation into the attack on the Capitol.</p>
<p>U. S. District Judge Eleanor L. Ross on Wednesday granted the government’s request to dismiss the case brought by Stefan Passantino, who claimed that members of the Committee leaked transcripts of confidential interviews to CNN to “ensure maximum damage” was done to his “reputation and his existing and future legal, political, and business clients.”</p>
<p>Passantino was deputy White House counsel during the first Trump administration who went back to the private sector during the Biden administration and worked for the Trump-supporting political action committee, Save America Leadership. There, he represented several people who testified before the Jan. 6 Committee.</p>
<p>Passantino was the first lawyer to represent Cassidy Hutchinson, the former special assistant to President Trump and Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, in her meetings with the Committee.</p>
<p>According to Passantino, then-Congresswoman Liz Cheney and Senior Investigative Counsel Dan George in May 2022 contacted Hutchinson without his knowledge and advised his client that he “would not be advancing her interests” because he “was being paid by a Trump-affiliated third-party,” which ultimately led to her seeking new counsel.</p>
<p>Hutchinson participated in several additional interviews and in December 2022, a CNN reporter contacted Passantino and said an unreleased transcript from one of Hutchinson’s interviews suggested he had counseled her “not to answer the Committee’s questions fully and honestly.”</p>
<p>Hutchinson testified that before her initial sessions with the Committee, Passantino would dangle potential jobs “in Trumpworld” and tell her she would be “taken care of.”</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>“I want to make this clear to you: Stefan never told me to lie,” she told the committee. “He specifically told me, ‘I don’t want you to perjure yourself, but ‘I don’t recall’ isn’t perjury. They don’t know what you can and can’t recall.&#8221;”</p>
<p>CNN then published <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/20/politics/trump-ethics-lawyer-passantino-cassidy-hutchinson-misleading-testimony-jan-6/index.html">an article</a> entitled “Trump’s former White House ethics lawyer told Cassidy Hutchinson to give misleading testimony to January 6 committee, sources say.”</p>
<p>Passantino claimed the interview transcripts contradicted CNN’s own story about him advising Hutchinson to be deceptive, but asserted the network went through with it anyway because it was given to them directly by the Committee.</p>
<p>He then filed a lawsuit under the <a href="https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R45732.pdf">Federal Tort Claims Act</a> (FTCA), which allows injured plaintiffs to file tort lawsuits against the federal government in certain circumstances, typically when a government actor causes injury through negligence.</p>
<p>In dismissing his lawsuit, the court reasoned that Passantino’s claims of invasion of privacy and civil conspiracy arose out of alleged libel and slander, both of which are explicitly exempted from FTCA claims.</p>
<p>Essentially, because Passantino’s allegations are based on the Committee allegedly leaking false statements about him to the media, those allegedly false statements cannot form the basis of a valid claim under the FTCA’s Intentional Tort Exception (other exceptions include assault, battery, malicious prosecution, false arrest).</p>
<p>Ross summed up the reasoning as follows:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“At bottom, ‘all of the [Committee’s] allegedly tortious actions here are based on statements, representations, or imputations’ — actions that would form the basis of a claim barred by the libel/slander exception. And Passantino cannot point to any action by the Committee independent of these ‘statements, representations, or imputations’ upon which to base his claims. Passantino insists that this ‘suit is not based on the defamatory sting of the ensuing publication’ but rather ‘the publication of private information.’ But this assertion contradicts the whole of Passantino’s claims, which necessarily depend on the falsity of the information the Committee leaked to the media. Without that false information, Passantino cannot attribute any of the harm alleged in the Complaint to an act by the Committee.<br />Passantino calls his claims ‘invasion of privacy’ and ‘civil conspiracy,’ but in substance, he asserts a claim for defamation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to Ross, when the defamation claims from Passantino’s complaint are removed, the only remaining conduct alleged is that the Committee leaked information relating to his attorney-client relationship with Hutchinson. However, Passantino failed to clarify what that “private information” was, she wrote.</p>
<p>Ross further asserted that a subsequent report released by the House Committee on House Administration entitled “The Failures and Politization of the January 6th Select Committee” only “further undermined” Passantino’s claim by “showing that the private information about Passantino the Committee disclosed to the media and in a complaint to the D.C. Bar was, in fact, defamatory.”</p>
<p>“Passantino’s injury is ‘wholly attributable’ to the Committee’s defamatory statements — conduct expressly immunized by,” Ross wrote. “And no reading of the Complaint, even in a light most favorable to Passantino, supports Passantino’s argument that his claims are based upon ‘other independent government action.&#8217;”</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/ex-trump-white-house-lawyers-lawsuit-against-jan-6-committee-tossed-because-information-members-leaked-to-cnn-was-in-fact-defamatory-against-him/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/ex-trump-ethics-lawyers-jan-6-committee-lawsuit-dismissed/">Ex-Trump ethics lawyer&#8217;s Jan. 6 Committee lawsuit dismissed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/ex-trump-ethics-lawyers-jan-6-committee-lawsuit-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Stefan-Passantino-appearing-on-The-Tucker-Carlson-Show-in-November-2024-YouTube.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
