Boy’s friends dump hot water on him in sleepover prank: Cops

homesafetytechpros — Mon, 06 Jan 2025 11:40:47 +0000

Insets: Tiffany West’s 12-year-old son who suffered second-degree burns on his face after an alleged prank went wrong during a sleepover (WALB/YouTube). Background: The apartment where Tiffany West’s son was burned (WALB/YouTube).

A group of young boys in Georgia, ages 12 to 15, are facing charges for allegedly dumping hot water on one of their “friends” in a sleepover prank gone wrong, according to police and the victim’s family.

“You got to be in shock to know your friends are capable of doing this to you,” the victim‘s aunt, Nachelle Austille, told local NBC and ABC affiliate WALB. “Like somebody you trusted. It’s just horrible. He never thought something like this would happen to him.”

Tiffany West, the victim’s mother, told the local station that her son, age 12, was at a sleepover at one of their neighbor’s apartments in Tifton — about 180 miles south of Atlanta — when his friends allegedly set upon him. It’s unclear when the sleepover occurred as West is choosing to keep certain details private.

She says hearing about what happened to her son, who suffered second-degree burns on most of his face, upset her deeply.

“I mean, I really can’t describe it now,” West said. “In that moment I was just mad, hurt, in shock. Everything, I was seeing red. I was just trying to hurry up and get him some help.”

Police have confirmed the details of the incident to WALB, saying three minors were charged and released to their families. It’s unclear what the charges are. West shared photos with WALB over the weekend of her son in recovery.

“He was transported to the burn center in Augusta,” she said of the aftermath. “He had to have surgery. Of course, he is out of surgery and is recovering at home, now. But it is going to take him 12-14 days to heal.”

West and the boy’s aunt both note how he’s kept quiet about what happened and his situation. “He just don’t have no emotions about it,” Austille said. “He’s numb. He’s numb about it.”

WALB reports that the three boys who were charged for the incident are awaiting their first hearing, which is expected to take place sometime in the next month.

West on Facebook says people have been reaching out to her and showing “love” to her family and son, whom she described as a “warrior” in a Jan. 3 post.

“Words can’t describe how Thankful I am for each & every one of you!” West wrote. “It brings tears to my eyes to know that SO many people care for me & my son & we are not alone in this! I drop to my knees every day Thanking God that my baby is still here & he is going to be ok bc it could have been worse! … My son is a Warrior & he has been so Strong! … Every donation, gift, encouraging words & prayer put a SMILE on my son face! Again, God Bless you all!”

Source link

The post Boy’s friends dump hot water on him in sleepover prank: Cops appeared first on Home Safety Tech Pros.

Trump’s Jan. 6 judge won’t stop Jack Smith evidence dump

homesafetytechpros — Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:20:32 +0000

Main: Former President Donald Trump motions as he returns to the court in New York (AP Photo/Seth Wenig). Inset left: Special Counsel Jack Smith (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File). Inset right: U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts via AP, File).

Not at all persuaded by Donald Trump’s request to keep special counsel Jack Smith’s immunity appendix under wraps until after the 2024 election, the former president’s Jan. 6 judge on Thursday scoffed at the “oxymoronic proposition” that hiding information from the public for political reasons will enhance its “understanding of this case.”

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Thursday refused to grant Trump a stay extension until Nov. 14, meaning that on Friday the stay will lift and she will “direct the Clerk of the Court to docket the Appendix, with the Government’s proposed redactions.”

The special counsel has referred to the appendix as “voluminous” and noted that it includes “interview transcripts and reports, [Presidential Daily Diaries] PDDs, emails and text messages, and other relevant records that the defendant has long possessed,” so for that reason it was no surprise the defense wanted to keep it out of public view, just as they opposed (without success) the release of Smith’s immunity brief.

The Thursday ruling from Chutkan boils down to this: the public has a right to access the documents at issue and “none” of the arguments the Trump team made in favor of further sealing were “persuasive.”

“Exercising that judgment, the court cannot conclude that an extended stay is appropriate,” the judge wrote, noting that the defense did “not engage with the six relevant factors for sealing” but instead largely focused on the document dump’s potential impact on the 2024 election.

Chutkan wasn’t swayed by the “too speculative” argument that the fact of the appendix going public would necessarily “poison the jury pool,” but she was even less convinced that keeping documents from the public would somehow be helpful.

“Setting aside the oxymoronic proposition that the public’s understanding of this case will be enhanced by withholding information about it, any public debate about the issues in this case has no bearing on the court’s resolution of those issues,” the judge said.

The judge reiterated that Trump’s presidential candidacy “does not implicate the concerns animating his official immunity,” and she “stressed” that his interests in being elected don’t control the scheduling in the case.

Turning a defense argument on its head, Chutkan wrote that hiding documents the public has a right to see — just because of politics — would be “election interference” in itself.

“There is undoubtedly a public interest in courts not inserting themselves into elections, or appearing to do so. But litigation’s incidental effects on politics are not the same as a court’s intentional interference with them,” she said. “As a result, it is in fact Defendant’s requested relief that risks undermining that public interest: If the court withheld information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that withholding could itself constitute—or appear to be—election interference.”

“The court will therefore continue to keep political considerations out of its decision-making, rather than incorporating them as Defendant requests,” Chutkan concluded.

Read the ruling here.

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Source link

The post Trump’s Jan. 6 judge won’t stop Jack Smith evidence dump appeared first on Home Safety Tech Pros.

dump Archives - Home Safety Tech Pros

Boy’s friends dump hot water on him in sleepover prank: Cops

Trump’s Jan. 6 judge won’t stop Jack Smith evidence dump