<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Communications Archives - Home Safety Tech Pros</title>
	<atom:link href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/communications/</link>
	<description>Home Safety Tech Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:16:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Internal CNN communications showcased in defamation trial</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/internal-cnn-communications-showcased-in-defamation-trial/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/internal-cnn-communications-showcased-in-defamation-trial/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[showcased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/internal-cnn-communications-showcased-in-defamation-trial/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fuzz Hogan on the witness stand during a defamation trial on Jan. 10, 2025 (Law&#38;Crime). A senior CNN employee found himself in the hot seat during the fourth day of the civil trial between the U.S. Navy veteran and the cable news network he claims defamed him in a story about his work extracting people [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/internal-cnn-communications-showcased-in-defamation-trial/">Internal CNN communications showcased in defamation trial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_501392" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-501392" class="size-full wp-image-501392" src="https://am23.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/01/Young-CNN-Day-4-Hogan.jpg" alt="Fuzz Hogan on the witness stand" width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-501392" class="wp-caption-text">Fuzz Hogan on the witness stand during a defamation trial on Jan. 10, 2025 (Law&amp;Crime).</p>
</div>
<p>A senior CNN employee found himself in the hot seat during the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OLund_VdJk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fourth day of the civil trial</a> between the U.S. Navy veteran and the cable news network he claims defamed him in a story about his work extracting people from war-torn Afghanistan.</p>
<p>Taking the stand was Fuzz Hogan, who is currently employed as a senior director with CNN’s standards and practices department.</p>
<p>The witness played a key role in <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/a-fraud-on-this-court-cnn-produces-surprise-document-to-accuse-navy-veteran-of-lying-in-defamation-case-while-plaintiff-complains-of-trial-by-ambush-and-judge-gets-fed-up/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the ongoing drama</a>; at the time the story in question aired, Hogan worked as a fact-checker and was the person responsible for clearing the facts in the story itself.</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>The offending coverage was a November 2021 segment on “The Lead with Jake Tapper.” The plaintiff’s lawsuit alleges the network falsely painted him as an “illegal profiteer” exploiting “desperate Afghans” with “exorbitant” fees amid the U.S.’s chaotic withdrawal.</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/he-went-from-patriot-to-criminal-lawyer-for-navy-veteran-suing-cnn-says-theres-overwhelming-evidence-network-knew-hit-piece-was-theater/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Young maintains</a> that CNN’s broadcast effectively tarred him as a scofflaw and ruined his business, making it nearly impossible for him to work because of the severe damage to his reputation that ensued.</p>
<p>A major aspect of the plaintiff’s case was always certain to include a circumspect look at how CNN’s employees discussed the story – before, during, and after publication.</p>
<p>On Friday, the final witness of the day offered the Florida jury a substantial degree of insight into some of those inner workings.</p>
<p>“I want to cover some of the things you didn’t know before publishing the story,” Young’s attorney Joe Delich said. “You didn’t know whether Mr. Young successfully evacuated anyone from Afghanistan before you published, right?”</p>
<p>Hogan replied in the affirmative.</p>
<p>“You also didn’t know if anyone at CNN even tried to find out whether Mr. Young successfully evacuated anyone from Afghanistan?” the plaintiff’s attorney asked.</p>
<p>The witness paused, then said: “I’d have to say I don’t know, but I can’t remember those three years ago, but yeah.”</p>
<p>Offered a chance to refresh his recollection, Hogan declined and agreed with Young’s lawyer: “No, it’s fine. I didn’t know. Sure.”</p>
<p>“So, you didn’t know if anyone at CNN even tried to find out whether Mr. Young successfully evacuated anyone from Afghanistan, right?” Delich asked yet again.</p>
<p>To which Hogan replied: “Not to my memory, no.”</p>
<p>The plaintiff’s attorney next asked whether Hogan knew the answer about Young’s success rate in Afghanistan now. The witness replied to say he did not know then and does not know now.</p>
<p>Finally, getting to the heart of this line of questioning, Delich pressed on and asked the witness: “And that’s because you didn’t think those things were relevant to the story, right?”</p>
<p>Hogan essayed a puzzled-looking face and replied: “I was a fact-checker then, so my job was to check the facts in the story as asserted. So, I – the facts – the story’s accurate.”</p>
<p>“But you didn’t think it was relevant to the way you reported the story, right?” Delich asked.</p>
<p>The witness responded: “I wouldn’t say it was not, irrelevant, or whatever the word – however you say that. But it wasn’t germane to the text we were – I was improving.”</p>
<p>Young’s attorney then directed the witness to a portion of his deposition.</p>
<p>Hogan read from the document and said he believed his answers were consistent with one another – and then laughed out loud.</p>
<p>Delich kept at this thread and asked again: “So, you didn’t think it was relevant whether anyone tried to find out that Mr. Young successfully evacuated anyone from Afghanistan?”</p>
<p>“I think my line here is consistent with what I just said,” Hogan replied. “In the form that we reported the piece, it wasn’t relevant.”</p>
<p>Attention then turned to an internal CNN discussion between Hogan and editor Tom Lumley about the digital version of the story.</p>
<p>Messages displayed for jurors showed Lumley’s thoughts about the story – penned by Alex Marquardt – in a series of messages to Hogan.</p>
<p>“That Alex story is not poetry in anyway,” Lumley wrote. “I just want to publish something to defuse some drama. I also think it’s half a good story. We should have carried on and reported it out more. Or he should have. I only saw a version at 2pm yesterday. Was not part of the process at all.”</p>
<p>Eventually, Hogan replied to the editor and wrote: “Feels like a good character but he only got 3/4 of the way toward the larger.”</p>
<p>Pressed to account for this response, the witness said his response evidenced some general measure of “agreeable sentiment” but insisted he did not agree with Lumley entirely.</p>
<p>“It’s his job to be an editor,” Hogan said. “He can have opinions about the story that are beyond my role.”</p>
<p>After some back-and-forth, the plaintiff’s attorney elicited testimony that Hogan, in fact, approved the story for publication.</p>
<p>Then Delich moved in for a piece of theater.</p>
<p>He asked: “Mr. Hogan, you approved this 3/4 story about Mr. Young because you thought he was a shit, didn’t you?”</p>
<p>Smiling through his answer as if to shrug off the jab, Hogan replied: “No.”</p>
<p>“Do you deny calling him a shit?” Delich pressed.</p>
<p>Hogan replied: “I don’t.”</p>
<p>Jurors and court-watchers were then treated to a magnified conversation between the witness and CNN reporter Elizabeth Wolfe.</p>
<p>In sum and substance, Wolfe appears to complain about Young’s business pitch for helping would-be evacuees with legal issues. Then, Hogan appears to join in the criticism and supplies the epithet.</p>
<p>The reporter griped: “wow this dude is promising them legal status or refugee status.”</p>
<p>Hogan wrote back: “Yeah, he’s a shit.”</p>
<div id="attachment_501394" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-501394" class="size-full wp-image-501394" src="https://am23.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/01/Young-CNN-Day-4-Messages.jpg" alt="Internal CNN communications used during a trial in Florida." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-501394" class="wp-caption-text">Internal CNN communications shown to jurors during a defamation trial on Jan. 10, 2025 (Law&amp;Crime).</p>
</div>
<p>Quizzed about those basic facts of their conversation, the witness answered in the affirmative.</p>
<p>With his wind-up stance thoroughly secured, Delich asked: “And then you went on to approve a 3/4 true story didn’t you?”</p>
<p>“Yes,” Hogan replied.</p>
<p>The plaintiff finished the direct examination of the witness on that note.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/yeah-hes-a-s-internal-cnn-communications-showcased-in-defamation-trial-between-navy-veteran-and-cable-news-network-as-senior-employee-takes-the-stand/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/internal-cnn-communications-showcased-in-defamation-trial/">Internal CNN communications showcased in defamation trial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/internal-cnn-communications-showcased-in-defamation-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Young-CNN-Day-4-Messages.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
            	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giuliani claims his emails are ‘not communications’ but ‘more like documents’ during hearing over whether he should be held in contempt</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/giuliani-claims-his-emails-are-not-communications-but-more-like-documents-during-hearing-over-whether-he-should-be-held-in-contempt/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/giuliani-claims-his-emails-are-not-communications-but-more-like-documents-during-hearing-over-whether-he-should-be-held-in-contempt/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 02:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[held]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rudy giuliani]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/giuliani-claims-his-emails-are-not-communications-but-more-like-documents-during-hearing-over-whether-he-should-be-held-in-contempt/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the 9/11 Memorial in New York City on September 11, 2022, on the 21st anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and Shanksville, Pennsylvania (John Nacion/STAR MAX/IPx). Rudy Giuliani appeared in a federal courtroom in Manhattan on Friday for a hearing on whether he should be [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/giuliani-claims-his-emails-are-not-communications-but-more-like-documents-during-hearing-over-whether-he-should-be-held-in-contempt/">Giuliani claims his emails are ‘not communications’ but ‘more like documents’ during hearing over whether he should be held in contempt</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_400796" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-400796" class="size-full wp-image-400796" src="https://am22.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2023/08/Rudy-Giuliani-squinting-at-phone.jpg" alt="" width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-400796" class="wp-caption-text">Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the 9/11 Memorial in New York City on September 11, 2022, on the 21st anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and Shanksville, Pennsylvania (John Nacion/STAR MAX/IPx).</p>
</div>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/rudy-giuliani/">Rudy Giuliani</a> appeared in a federal courtroom in Manhattan on Friday for a hearing on whether he should be held in <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/contempt/">contempt</a> after the onetime personal attorney for President-elect <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/donald-trump/">Donald Trump</a> allegedly flouted multiple court orders in connection with the two Georgia election workers he defamed trying to collect the $148 million judgment awarded in their favor.</p>
<p>Last month, U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman, a Trump appointee, ordered Giuliani to appear in person for the Jan. 3 hearing on the contempt issue following <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-tears-into-rudy-giulianis-disrespect-for-the-law-as-defamed-georgia-election-workers-ask-he-be-held-in-contempt/">numerous requests from the plaintiffs</a> regarding his “consistent pattern of willful defiance” involving court orders to turn over of his personal property and provide information to plaintiffs for discovery.</p>
<p>Liman on Thursday <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/will-not-later-be-heard-to-complain-rudy-giulianis-decision-not-to-testify-at-his-own-contempt-hearing-met-with-disdain-by-defamed-election-workers/">rejected Giuliani’s last-minute request</a> to appear virtually for the contempt hearing after the former New York City mayor said he was “having medical issues with his left knee” as well as “breathing problems due to lung issues” that were the result of him “being at the World Trade Center site on September 11, 2001.”</p>
<p>The hearing, which began at 10 a.m., went through the day and will be continued at the same time on Monday. However, Liman will allow Giuliani to appear virtually for the proceedings as he will not be questioned by plaintiff’s counsel again.</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>During the proceedings, Giuliani claimed that he part of the problem with his failure to produce pre-trial discovery was that he did not believe emails constituted “communication,” <a href="https://x.com/innercitypress/status/1875307707198271713">according to</a> the Inner City Press, which attended the hearing.</p>
<p>According to the report, Giuliani was testifying under oath when he made the seemingly outlandish claim.</p>
<p>“Do you understand that the term ‘communications’ would include emails?” Freeman and Moss’ attorney asked Giuliani, per Inner City Press.</p>
<p>“I don’t think so, no,” Giuliani reportedly responded.</p>
<p>“It is your testimony that emails are not communications?” plaintiffs’ attorney said in retort.</p>
<p>Giuliani reportedly held his ground, saying of emails, “They are more like documents.”</p>
<p>Friday’s hearing came after Liman last week <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/the-law-imposes-consequences-judge-signals-pending-punishment-for-rudy-giuliani-for-disregarding-court-orders/">signaled that he was likely to punish Giuliani</a> for his repeated failures to follow court orders and called out the former U.S. attorney for filing court documents explaining his shortcomings with assertions Giuliani <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/defendant-knows-that-assertion-to-be-untrue-judge-unseals-document-exposing-rudy-giuliani-lying-about-why-his-attorneys-quit-in-defamation-case-from-election-workers/">knew “to be untrue</a>.”</p>
<p>Giuliani has had a <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/you-are-against-me-giuliani-lashes-out-at-trump-appointed-federal-judge-in-148-million-defamation-case/">rocky relationship</a> with Liman, even going so far as to interrupt the judge during an in-person hearing last month to exclaim, “You are against me!” to Liman.</p>
<p>Following that hearing, Giuliani spoke to reporters outside the courthouse, where he railed against Liman, accusing the jurist of being an “activist Democrat,” Politico <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/26/giuliani-rant-judge-00191717">reported</a>. Liman was appointed to the court by Donald Trump in 2019.</p>
<p>“Have you figured out what side he’s on? Are you too dumb to see what side he’s on?” Giuliani reportedly asked. “I’ve been a lawyer for 55 years. I can figure out what side he’s on.”</p>
<p>Giuliani reportedly continued the Liman diatribe as he got on the elevator.</p>
<p>“He doesn’t give a damn about the truth. He just gives a damn about being popular,” adding, “This is lawfare with capital letters.”</p>
<p>Giuliani’s legal woes are far from over, as he is scheduled to appear in federal court in Washington, D.C. next week for a separate contempt hearing before U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who presided over the defamation trial just over a year ago.</p>
<p>That hearing stems from Freeman and Moss seeking to hold Giuliani in contempt for allegedly <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/rudy-giuliani-threatened-with-arsenal-of-sanctions-and-imprisonment-after-he-blamed-judges-ideological-demeanor-for-him-being-unable-to-hire-an-attorney/">violating an order</a> barring him from repeating the defamatory claims he made about the duo. The election workers in November filed a motion claiming his defamatory campaign against them continued even after they were awarded the astronomical judgment and Giuliani declared bankruptcy.</p>
<p>According to the filing, the former U.S. Attorney for Manhattan had been “brazenly violating that consent injunction” by repeating “the exact same lies” that resulted in the initial defamation judgment against Giuliani.</p>
<p>Giuliani’s dealings with Howell have not been much better than those he’s had with Liman. After <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/giuliani-likely-to-be-held-in-contempt-for-missing-filing-deadline-after-telling-court-it-was-his-main-focus-right-now/">missing a filing deadline</a> with her last month to respond to the motion for contempt, Giuliani <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/your-honor-is-unreasonable-and-biased-about-trump-federal-judge-swiftly-rejects-giulianis-already-late-request-for-filing-extension-which-blamed-her-for-rudys-inability-to-find-a-lawyer/">claimed it was Howell’s bias</a> that had made it impossible for him to hire an attorney to represent him in the matter.</p>
<p>“I have spoken to four attorneys and each attorney has declined to handle this matter because they believe Your Honor is unreasonable and biased about [Donald] Trump-related matters and ‘ideological rather than logical,’” Giuliani wrote. “One said it was ‘a foregone conclusion’ and ‘a no-win proposition.’ Among other numerous reasons your handling of the J6 (Jan. 6) cases is considered by many to be the most unnecessarily harsh.”</p>
<p>Giuliani is scheduled to appear before Liman again on Jan. 16, to begin trial over whether he will have to turnover his Yankees World Series Rings and Florida condominium to Moss and Freeman.</p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/giuliani-claims-his-emails-are-not-communications-but-more-like-documents-during-hearing-over-whether-he-should-be-held-in-contempt/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/giuliani-claims-his-emails-are-not-communications-but-more-like-documents-during-hearing-over-whether-he-should-be-held-in-contempt/">Giuliani claims his emails are ‘not communications’ but ‘more like documents’ during hearing over whether he should be held in contempt</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/giuliani-claims-his-emails-are-not-communications-but-more-like-documents-during-hearing-over-whether-he-should-be-held-in-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Rudy-Giuliani-squinting-at-phone.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
            	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BLM seeks input on proposed Broadband Communications Site in Morongo Valley</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/blm-seeks-input-on-proposed-broadband-communications-site-in-morongo-valley/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/blm-seeks-input-on-proposed-broadband-communications-site-in-morongo-valley/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morongo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valley]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/blm-seeks-input-on-proposed-broadband-communications-site-in-morongo-valley/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Updated Sept. 13, 2024. PALM SPRINGS, Calif. – The Bureau of Land Management is seeking public input on the draft environmental assessment and land use plan amendment for the proposed Morongo Canyon Highway 62 Multi-Tenant Wireless Broadband Communications Site project in San Bernardino County. If approved, the project would improve telecommunication and broadband connections for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/blm-seeks-input-on-proposed-broadband-communications-site-in-morongo-valley/">BLM seeks input on proposed Broadband Communications Site in Morongo Valley</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div>
<p><strong><em>Updated Sept. 13, 2024.</em></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">PALM SPRINGS, Calif</span></span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">. – <a name="_Hlk172710564">The Bureau of Land Management is seeking public input on the draft environmental assessment and land use plan amendment for the proposed </a><a name="_Hlk172710387">Morongo Canyon Highway 62 Multi-Tenant Wireless Broadband Communications Site project in San Bernardino County.</a><a name="_Hlk172710372"> If approved, the project would improve telecommunication and broadband connections for Morongo and Yucca valley communities.</a> </span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">The applicant, InterConnect Towers LLC, proposes to construct, operate, and maintain a broadband communication site with an access road and ancillary facilities on just over two acres of public lands in Morongo Valley in southeastern San Bernardino County.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">“The BLM will consider potential site-specific effects the proposed communication site may have on visual resources,” said <b>California Desert District Manager Shelly Lynch</b>. “We want to hear from the community on this project.”</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">The BLM, as the lead federal agency for </span></span><a href="https://www.blm.gov/programs/planning-and-nepa/what-informs-our-plans/nepa" style="color:blue; text-decoration:underline"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">National Environmental Policy Act</span></span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto"> review, drafted an environmental assessment that considers scoping comments, issues, planning criteria, potential effects, alternatives, and mitigation measures.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><a name="_Hlk172710474"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">Implementation of the proposal would require a BLM decision to amend the </span></span></a><a href="https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/66949/510" style="color:blue; text-decoration:underline"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">California Desert Conservation Area Plan</span></span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">, as amended by the </span></span><a href="https://www.blm.gov/programs/planning-and-nepa/plans-in-development/california/desert-renewable-energy-conservation-plan" style="color:blue; text-decoration:underline"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Area Plan</span></span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">, to modify the proposed action area visual resource objectives from retaining the existing character of the landscape to partially retaining the existing character of the landscape.</span></span><a name="_Hlk172710546"/></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">The BLM will hold an in-person public meeting with a virtual option on Thursday, Sept.5 at 5:30 p.m., at the </span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="background:white"><span style="font-family:Roboto"><span style="color:#242424">Community Services District Multipurpose Room </span></span></span></span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="background:white"><span style="font-family:Roboto"><span style="color:black">in Covington Park, located at 11165 Vale Drive in Morongo Valley, CA 92256.  </span></span></span></span><a href="https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/b08f2bb0-0b8f-4f80-af53-895886fcc6f4@3d234255-e20f-4205-88a5-9658a402999b" style="color:blue; text-decoration:underline"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">Advance registration</span></span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto"> is required to attend virtually.</span></span></span></span></span> <strong><em>The public comment period will close Oct. 7<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">. (updated 09/13/2024)</span></span></span></span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background:white"><span style="font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif"><span style="font-family:Roboto"><span style="color:#212529">Public comments may be submitted through the “Participate Now” function on the </span></span><span style="color:black"><a href="https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/1502263/510" style="color:blue; text-decoration:underline"><span style="font-family:Roboto">BLM National NEPA Register</span></a></span><span style="font-family:Roboto"><span style="color:#212529"> (preferred); emailed to </span></span><span style="color:black"><a href="https://www.blm.gov/press-release/mailto:blm_ca_ps_morongocommunicationsite@blm.gov" style="color:blue; text-decoration:underline"><span style="font-family:Roboto">blm_ca_ps_morongocommunicationsite@blm.gov</span></a></span><span style="font-family:Roboto"><span style="color:black">; or delivered to</span></span><span style="font-family:Roboto"><span style="color:#212529"> “Morongo Communication Site Project EA,” Attn: <a name="_Hlk172710227">Matt Toedtli, Project Manager, Bureau of Land Management, California Desert District Office, </a>1201 Bird Center Drive in Palm Springs, CA 92262.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">For additional information, please email: </span></span><a href="https://www.blm.gov/press-release/mailto:blm_ca_ps_morongocommunicationsite@blm.gov" style="color:blue; text-decoration:underline"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">blm_ca_ps_morongocommunicationsite@blm.gov</span></span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:Roboto">.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
</div>
<p><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.blm.gov/press-release/blm-seeks-input-proposed-broadband-communications-site-morongo-valley">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/blm-seeks-input-on-proposed-broadband-communications-site-in-morongo-valley/">BLM seeks input on proposed Broadband Communications Site in Morongo Valley</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/blm-seeks-input-on-proposed-broadband-communications-site-in-morongo-valley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.blm.gov/sites/default/files/styles/og_image/public/images/2024-08/53925134561_4d26f8cc07_osm.jpg?h=8b46c899&#038;itok=3OxYd66C" medium="image"></media:content>
            	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
