<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chief Archives - Home Safety Tech Pros</title>
	<atom:link href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/chief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/chief/</link>
	<description>Home Safety Tech Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 12:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Former Accounting Chief at Now-Defunct Girardi Keese Law Firm Sentenced to Over 10 Years in Prison for Defrauding Firm and Clients</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/former-accounting-chief-at-now-defunct-girardi-keese-law-firm-sentenced-to-over-10-years-in-prison-for-defrauding-firm-and-clients/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/former-accounting-chief-at-now-defunct-girardi-keese-law-firm-sentenced-to-over-10-years-in-prison-for-defrauding-firm-and-clients/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 12:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defrauding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girardi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NowDefunct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentenced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Years]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/former-accounting-chief-at-now-defunct-girardi-keese-law-firm-sentenced-to-over-10-years-in-prison-for-defrauding-firm-and-clients/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The former head of the accounting department at the downtown Los Angeles plaintiffs injury law firm Girardi Keese was sentenced to 121 months in prison. Source link</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/former-accounting-chief-at-now-defunct-girardi-keese-law-firm-sentenced-to-over-10-years-in-prison-for-defrauding-firm-and-clients/">Former Accounting Chief at Now-Defunct Girardi Keese Law Firm Sentenced to Over 10 Years in Prison for Defrauding Firm and Clients</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
<br />The former head of the accounting department at the downtown Los Angeles plaintiffs injury law firm Girardi Keese was sentenced to 121 months in prison.<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/losangeles/news/former-accounting-chief-at-now-defunct-girardi-keese-law-firm-sentenced-to-over-10-years-in-prison-for-defrauding-firm-and-clients">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/former-accounting-chief-at-now-defunct-girardi-keese-law-firm-sentenced-to-over-10-years-in-prison-for-defrauding-firm-and-clients/">Former Accounting Chief at Now-Defunct Girardi Keese Law Firm Sentenced to Over 10 Years in Prison for Defrauding Firm and Clients</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/former-accounting-chief-at-now-defunct-girardi-keese-law-firm-sentenced-to-over-10-years-in-prison-for-defrauding-firm-and-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Texas chief justice criticizes ABA, state supreme court reconsiders ABA accreditation for law schools</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 23:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accreditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accreditation & Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Career & Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconsiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Home Daily News After Texas chief justice criticizes ABA,… Law Schools After Texas chief justice criticizes ABA, state supreme court reconsiders ABA accreditation for law schools By Debra Cassens Weiss April 8, 2025, 3:54 pm CDT The Texas Supreme Court is inviting comments on a requirement that law grads seeking bar admission in the state [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools/">After Texas chief justice criticizes ABA, state supreme court reconsiders ABA accreditation for law schools</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="story_page_body" style="margin:0; padding:0; max-width:750px;">
		<!-- begin main content area --></p>
<ol class="breadcrumb">
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/" title="Home">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/" title="Read the Daily News">Daily News</a></li>
<li class="active">After Texas chief justice criticizes ABA,…</li>
</ol>
<p>Law Schools</p>
<h2>After Texas chief justice criticizes ABA, state supreme court reconsiders ABA accreditation for law schools</h2>
<p>			<!-- toolbar --></p>
<p class="byline">By <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/authors/4/" title="View this author's information" style="color:{default_link_color};">Debra Cassens Weiss</a></p>
<p class="dateline"><time>April 8, 2025, 3:54 pm CDT</time></p>
<p>				<!-- primary story image --></p>
<div class="floating_image" style="max-width:750px; margin:20px 10px 10px 0;">
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/texas_state_and_flag_square.png" alt="Texas state outline and flag" width="350"/></p>
<p><em>The Texas Supreme Court is inviting comments on a requirement that law grads seeking bar admission in the state must have graduated from a law school accredited by the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. (Image from Shutterstock)</em></p>
</p></div>
<p>				<!-- end primary story image --></p>
<p>			<!--no pagination logic--></p>
<p>The Texas Supreme Court is inviting comments on a requirement that law grads seeking bar admission in the state must have graduated from a law school accredited by the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar.</p>
<p>In an <a href="https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1460232/259018.pdf">April 4 order</a>, the Texas Supreme Court requested feedback on whether to “reduce or end” reliance on the ABA as an accrediting agency and “alternatives the court should consider.”</p>
<p>The state supreme court is inviting comments from the Texas Board of Law Examiners, Texas law school deans, the bar and the public, the order said.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.law360.com/articles/2321394">Law360</a> covered the story.</p>
<p>The Texas Supreme Court did not comment on the reason for its order. But Chief Justice James D. Blacklock criticized the ABA in his February <a href="https://www.txcourts.gov/supreme/news/chief-justice-jimmy-blacklock-delivers-2025-state-of-the-judiciary-address">State of the Judiciary address</a> for “aggressively taking sides in the fight going on in Washington about the scope of the president’s executive power.”</p>
<p>ABA President Bill Bay <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/aba-president-bay-denounces-chaotic-attacks-on-the-rule-of-law">has criticized</a> the Trump administration’s “wholesale dismantling of departments and entities created by Congress,” as well as “efforts to dismiss employees with little regard for the law and protections they merit.”</p>
<p>The Texas Supreme Court’s order follows a similar move <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/dei-standard-prompts-florida-toreconsider-aba-accreditation">last month</a> by Florida’s top court. It has created a subgroup to reconsider the requirement that law grads taking the Florida bar exam must have graduated from an ABA-accredited law school.</p>
<p>The Florida Supreme Court took action because of “reasonable questions” about an accreditation standard on diversity and “the ABA’s active political engagement,” according to a press release. The Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/legal-ed-council-suspended-diversity-standard-bondi-wants-it-scrapped">has suspended enforcement</a> of its diversity standard as it works on revisions.</p>
<p>The Association of American Law Schools is making the case for national accreditation of law schools in an <a href="https://www.aals.org/app/uploads/2025/04/AALS-Letter-on-ABA-Accreditation-4-8-25.pdf">April 8 open letter</a> that has also been submitted to working groups considering the accreditation issue in Texas and Florida.</p>
<p>Thirty-three law schools, most of them in California, don’t have ABA accreditation. Most have “extremely low bar exam pass rates, poor job outcomes and high attrition rates,” the letter said.</p>
<p>The letter said national accreditation is critical for ensuring “a minimum baseline of quality in legal education and practice.” Most states don’t have the resources to sufficiently evaluate law schools, and “piecemeal, fragmented or overlapping regulation would increase costs on law schools, their students and the profession,” the letter said.</p>
<p>Creating different barriers to a law license that vary by state would also hamper lawyer mobility and add to lawyer deserts, the letter said.</p>
<p>The letter also clarified that the ABA does not accredit law schools. Instead, that job is handled by the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, “a national accrediting entity that is separate and independent from the bar association.”</p>
<p>Jennifer L. Rosato Perea, the managing director accreditation and legal education for the ABA, issued a statement to the ABA Journal.</p>
<p>The council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar “understands the [Texas] Supreme Court’s need to thoughtfully consider the council’s continued role in accreditation and hear from a variety of perspectives to ensure that this accreditation continues to serve its admission requirements,” the statement said.</p>
<p>“The council’s primary purpose in accreditation has been and continues to be contributing meaningfully to the production of effective and ethical lawyers, as well as serving the interests of the public in Texas and all other states throughout the United States.”</p>
<p>			<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/contact?referrer=https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools" class="feedback-cta"><br />
    Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error.<br />
</a></p></div>
<p><script src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=250025978358202&amp;xfbml=1"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools/?utm_source=feeds&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools/">After Texas chief justice criticizes ABA, state supreme court reconsiders ABA accreditation for law schools</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-texas-chief-justice-criticizes-aba-state-supreme-court-reconsiders-aba-accreditation-for-law-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/texas_state_and_flag_square.png" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>After DC Circuit reinstates fired agency board members, chief justice pauses action</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-dc-circuit-reinstates-fired-agency-board-members-chief-justice-pauses-action/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-dc-circuit-reinstates-fired-agency-board-members-chief-justice-pauses-action/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor & Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pauses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinstates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials & Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-dc-circuit-reinstates-fired-agency-board-members-chief-justice-pauses-action/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Home Daily News After DC Circuit reinstates fired agency… Executive Branch After DC Circuit reinstates fired agency board members, chief justice pauses action By Debra Cassens Weiss April 9, 2025, 9:11 am CDT The E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse on Judiciary Square in Washington, D.C., is home to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-dc-circuit-reinstates-fired-agency-board-members-chief-justice-pauses-action/">After DC Circuit reinstates fired agency board members, chief justice pauses action</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="story_page_body" style="margin:0; padding:0; max-width:750px;">
		<!-- begin main content area --></p>
<ol class="breadcrumb">
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/" title="Home">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/" title="Read the Daily News">Daily News</a></li>
<li class="active">After DC Circuit reinstates fired agency…</li>
</ol>
<p>Executive Branch</p>
<h2>After DC Circuit reinstates fired agency board members, chief justice pauses action</h2>
<p>			<!-- toolbar --></p>
<p class="byline">By <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/authors/4/" title="View this author's information" style="color:{default_link_color};">Debra Cassens Weiss</a></p>
<p class="dateline"><time>April 9, 2025, 9:11 am CDT</time></p>
<p>				<!-- primary story image --></p>
<div class="floating_image" style="max-width:750px; margin:20px 10px 10px 0;">
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_DC_appeals_court_building_800px.jpg" alt="shutterstock_DC appeals court building_800px" width="750"/></p>
<p><em>The E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse on Judiciary Square in Washington, D.C., is home to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. (Photo from <a href="https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/washington-dcusaapril-17-2019-e-barrett-1373732282">Shutterstock</a>)</em></p>
</p></div>
<p>				<!-- end primary story image --></p>
<p>			<!--no pagination logic--></p>
<p><strong>Updated:</strong> Chief Justice John Roberts has temporarily blocked reinstatement of fired board members of two independent agencies after an en banc federal appeals court ruled in their favor Monday.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, Roberts issued <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040925zr_p8k0.pdf">an administrative stay</a> that paused reinstatement of Cathy Harris to the Merit Systems Protection Board and Gwynne A. Wilcox to the National Labor Relations Board, <a href="https://www.law360.com/publicpolicy/articles/2323391">Law360</a> reports.</p>
<p>In its <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.41813/gov.uscourts.cadc.41813.01208727297.0.pdf">April 7 order</a>, the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated a three-judge panel decision <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/dc-circuit-allows-trump-to-fire-independent-agency-board-members-pending-appeal">that allowed</a> Trump to remove Harris and Wilcox.</p>
<p>The NLRB enforces labor laws, while the MSPB considers workplace disputes by federal employees. Boards overseeing the agencies resolve appeals following decisions by administrative law judges.</p>
<p>The D.C. Circuit’s en banc order revived a reinstatement order by U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell of the District of Columbia, <a href="https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2025/04/07/judicially-imposed-fiction-dc-circuit-judge-pans-order-reinstating-nlrb-mspb-members/?slreturn=20250409-34638">Law.com</a> reports.</p>
<p>The en banc court cited a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision, <em>Humphrey’s Executor v. United States</em>, and a 1958 Supreme Court decision, <em>Wiener v. United States</em>. Those decisions upheld restrictions on removal of government officials on multimember adjudicatory boards, the appeals court said.</p>
<p>“The Supreme Court’s repeated and recent statements that <em>Humphrey’s Executor</em> and <em>Wiener</em> remain precedential require denying the government’s emergency motions for a stay pending appeal,” the en banc majority said.</p>
<p>Four out of 11 en banc judges dissented.</p>
<p>The case is <em>Trump v. Wilcox</em>.</p>
<p><em>Updated April 9 at 4:17 p.m. to include information on Chief Justice John Roberts’ administrative stay.</em></p>
<p>			<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/contact?referrer=https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/en-banc-federal-appeals-court-reinstates-fired-board-members-of-independent-agencies" class="feedback-cta"><br />
    Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error.<br />
</a></p></div>
<p><script src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=250025978358202&amp;xfbml=1"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/en-banc-federal-appeals-court-reinstates-fired-board-members-of-independent-agencies/?utm_source=feeds&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-dc-circuit-reinstates-fired-agency-board-members-chief-justice-pauses-action/">After DC Circuit reinstates fired agency board members, chief justice pauses action</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/after-dc-circuit-reinstates-fired-agency-board-members-chief-justice-pauses-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_DC_appeals_court_building_800px.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona vice chief justice discusses innovation, retention elections</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/arizona-vice-chief-justice-discusses-innovation-retention-elections/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/arizona-vice-chief-justice-discusses-innovation-retention-elections/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 05:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discusses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/arizona-vice-chief-justice-discusses-innovation-retention-elections/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bold. Innovative. Visionary. At a time when many courts are losing the battle to provide access to justice, especially in low-income communities, the Arizona Supreme Court has brought fresh ideas to bridge the justice gap. Vice Chief Justice John Lopez, at the invitation of the ABA Crossroads Caucus, discussed innovations his court has recently put [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/arizona-vice-chief-justice-discusses-innovation-retention-elections/">Arizona vice chief justice discusses innovation, retention elections</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
<br /><img decoding="async" src="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/John_Lopez_AP_square_600px.jpg" /></p>
<div style="margin-left:65px;">
<p>Bold. Innovative. Visionary. At a time when many courts are losing the battle to provide access to justice, especially in low-income communities, the Arizona Supreme Court has brought fresh ideas to bridge the justice gap.</p>
<p>Vice Chief Justice John Lopez, at the invitation of the ABA Crossroads Caucus, discussed innovations his court has recently put in place in a conversation with moderator Mark Martin, dean of High Point University School of Law at the ABA Midyear Meeting in Phoenix in February.</p>
<p>As reported by the Legal Services Corporation in its most recent Justice Gap Study in 2022, low-income Americans do not get any or enough legal help for 92% of their substantive civil legal problems. To address this issue, Lopez and his colleagues have focused on improving access to legal services by lowering costs and increasing options. For lower income citizens, the court approved several programs, including the Legal Paraprofessional Program, the Lawyer Apprentice Program, the Legal Advocate Program and the Government Law Admission Program.</p>
<p>The Legal Paraprofessional Program, to highlight a very successful program, has been in operation since early 2021. It grants a license that allows nonlawyers to offer limited legal services, including legal advice; drafting and filing legal documents, opinions and strategies; and representing clients in court. The first licenses were granted in November 2021, and Arizona has 65 licensed LPs. The program improves access to justice by allowing trained nonlawyers to represent clients in criminal, family, civil, administrative and juvenile law matters. The University of Arizona and Arizona State University offer a Master of Legal Studies that prepares students for the legal paraprofessional licensure exam.</p>
<p>To address the problem of Arizona’s “legal deserts,” a term coined by the ABA to describe counties with few or no lawyers (i.e., fewer than one lawyer per 1,000 residents), the Arizona Supreme Court approved a Lawyer Apprentice Program. The program encourages aspiring lawyers to stay in Arizona, creates a pathway to licensure for law graduates with lower bar scores and increases the number of lawyers in the state. In a state that ranks 49th of 50 states in lawyers per capita, such a program is a necessity, but it’s a very disciplined necessity: Applicants must (1) be graduates of an ABA-accredited law school (2) score 260-269 on the Uniform Bar Exam (3) and commit to practice under the supervision of a qualified Arizona attorney for at least two years in rural Arizona or a public law practice.</p>
<p>More controversial are the Arizona Supreme Court-approved “Alternative Business Structures.” The ABS program allows nonlawyers to partner with lawyers in businesses that provide legal services. The program was created to encourage innovation in legal services and make them more affordable. ABS are subject to the Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court regulating the practice of law, including the requirement that the ABS employ a member of the Arizona Bar who supervises the practice of law. While such arrangements are common in the United Kingdom and Australia, they are actively debated in the U.S.</p>
<p>When Big Four accounting firm KPMG was approved on Feb. 27 to own a law firm under the ABS program, some skeptics asked whether such a step would actually bridge the justice gap or lower costs for lower-income citizens. Lopez acknowledges that some have also raised concerns that the “one-stop shop” model may put traditional firms out of business.</p>
<p>As part of the Arizona Judiciary’s Five-Year Plan, Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer, a 2021 ABA Journal Legal Rebel, has made public trust and confidence in the judiciary a foundational goal. Lopez strongly supports this goal, and the court has put in place several initiatives to address the problem.</p>
<p>He told his audience: “Much of the public’s distrust in our courts is driven by inaccurate media coverage of our cases. Too often, media coverage centers on a case result and often fails to accurately identify the issue, if at all. Inaccurate framing of judicial decisions is then used to drive a narrative that judicial opinions are invariably political decisions. To that end, too many media reports on judicial opinions are limited to the party affiliation of the judge, the case result and its political significance or palatability. This coverage encourages public cynicism and distrust of courts.”</p>
<p>To counter objectively inaccurate characterizations of judicial opinions, the Arizona Supreme Court recently adopted a practice of releasing a brief summary of the judicial opinion that identifies the issues and sets out the reasoning and the decision in the case. Lopez observed that the initial results seem to be positive, noting that coverage of judicial decisions has been more accurate. He said the purpose and effect is not to diminish critical reporting of decisions, but to increase the likelihood that the criticisms and coverage accurately reflect the actual issues, reasoning and conclusions in the case.</p>
<p>Lopez’s final topic was retention elections. Arizona adopted a merit selection system in 1974 that applies to Arizona’s appellate judges and trial court judges in Arizona’s four most populous counties, where a nonpartisan commission of lawyers and citizens investigates and evaluates candidates for judicial positions. The commission then submits the names of the most highly qualified applicants to the governor, who makes the appointment from that list.</p>
<p>Once appointed, judges are subject to retention through regularly scheduled retention elections, by which a majority of votes in favor of a judge results in retention for another term. During judges’ terms, beginning in 1992, a commission of citizens and lawyers, known as “Judicial Performance Review,” assessed judges’ performances and issued recommendations to the voters prior to an election.</p>
<p>From 1974 to 2020, no endorsed judge had ever been removed by voters. In fact, most judges recommended for removal by JPR were retained by voters. Moreover, during those nearly 50 years, only three judges were removed by voters in retention elections; all were embroiled in legal scandal or were otherwise deemed unfit by the JPR Commission.</p>
<p>But, Lopez said, “Something began to change about Arizona’s retention elections in 2020. For the first time, a major political party targeted judges for nonretention. All were retained. But in 2022, voters failed to retain three Maricopa County Superior Court judges. In other words, as many judges were removed by voters in one election as had been removed over the previous 48 years. Notably, two of the three judges had been recommended for retention by the JPR Commission—a first in the history of Arizona’s merit selection system. One of the judges was targeted not for his judicial performance, but rather for his prior associations and his work as an assistant A.G. in Arizona.”</p>
<p>In 2024, the merit selection system, including the retention election, became a major political issue. One side of the partisan/ideological divide cited an unpopular abortion decision, while the other side of the divide expressed dissatisfaction with the court’s election decisions. These political forces culminated in two primary events: (1) a significant campaign was marshaled to remove two members of the Arizona Supreme Court (2) and Proposition 137 was placed on the ballot to eliminate routine retention election for judges unless they committed various crimes, filed personal bankruptcy or were not recommended for retention by JPR. This proposition was rejected by nearly 80% of voters.</p>
<p>Lopez concluded his presentation by questioning the wisdom of politicizing the merit selection process. He quoted the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor who called the prospect of jettisoning the merit selection system “a great step backwards.”</p>
<hr/>
<p><em>Jo Ann Engelhardt is a member of the ABA Board of Governors representing District 8, a member of the board of the American Bar Foundation and a founding member of the ABA Crossroads Caucus.</em></p>
<hr/>
<p><strong>This column reflects the opinions of the author and not necessarily the views of the ABA Journal—or the American Bar Association.</strong></p>
</p></div>
<p><script src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=250025978358202&amp;xfbml=1"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/columns/article/dialogue-on-deregulation-and-politicization-arizona-vice-chief-justice-john-lopez-discusses-innovation-and-retention-elections/?utm_source=feeds&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/arizona-vice-chief-justice-discusses-innovation-retention-elections/">Arizona vice chief justice discusses innovation, retention elections</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/arizona-vice-chief-justice-discusses-innovation-retention-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/John_Lopez_AP_square_600px.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Justice bails out Trump on labor board firings</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-bails-out-trump-on-labor-board-firings/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-bails-out-trump-on-labor-board-firings/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 01:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington d.c.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-bails-out-trump-on-labor-board-firings/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump greets Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts as he arrives to deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2020 (Leah Millis/Pool via AP). Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday once again swooped in at [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-bails-out-trump-on-labor-board-firings/">Chief Justice bails out Trump on labor board firings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="post-body">
<div id="attachment_514399" style="width: 1210px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-514399" class="size-full wp-image-514399" src="https://am22.mediaite.com/lc/cnt/uploads/2025/03/asdfadfadfafd.jpg" alt="President Donald Trump greets Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts as he arrives to deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2020 (Leah Millis/Pool via AP)." width="1200" height="627"/></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-514399" class="wp-caption-text">President Donald Trump greets Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts as he arrives to deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2020 (Leah Millis/Pool via AP).</p>
</div>
<p>Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday once again <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/scotus/">swooped in at the eleventh hour</a> to bail out the <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/tag/donald-trump/">Trump</a> administration, this time <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/no-such-power-is-given-to-the-president-full-appeals-court-thwarts-trumps-firing-of-biden-appointed-board-members-setting-stage-for-scotus-showdown/">staying an appellate court order</a> preventing the president from ousting two Biden-appointed members of independent federal labor agencies.</p>
<p>Roberts did not rule on the merits of the case, but stayed a lower court order that reinstated two chairwomen to their positions on independent federal labor boards in a case that is likely to have wide-reaching implications on Donald Trump’s continued effort to slash the government workforce and wield unprecedented control over the federal bureaucracy.</p>
<p>The chief justice’s order was handed down within hours of the Justice Department filing a petition urging the high court to intervene after the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., affirmed a lower court order reinstating Cathy A. Harris to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) and Gwynne Wilcox to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).</p>
<p>The <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/no-such-power-is-given-to-the-president-full-appeals-court-thwarts-trumps-firing-of-biden-appointed-board-members-setting-stage-for-scotus-showdown/">appeals court previously reasoned</a> that the fired chairwomen were improperly dismissed without cause, violating federal law.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the administration has argued that prohibiting the president from selecting personnel in the executive branch impedes his ability to do his job, asserting, “this situation is untenable.”</p>
<p>“This case raises a constitutional question of profound importance: whether the President can supervise and control agency heads who exercise vast executive power on the President’s behalf, or whether Congress may insulate those agency heads from presidential control by preventing the President from removing them at will,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer <a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25893166/24a966.pdf">wrote in the 39-page petition</a>. “[T]he district court’s orders violate Article II on an independent and equally troubling basis. Federal courts lack any constitutional, statutory, or equitable authority to order the reinstatement of agency heads whom the President has removed and to force the President to rely on principal officers whom the President believes should not be exercising any executive power. Exercising non-existent equitable authority to saddle the President with already-removed principal officers ‘deeply wounds the President’ in his exercise of the executive power.”</p>
<aside class="o-callout__recirculate o-callout"/>
<p>Harris, a Democrat, was supposed to serve until her term expired in 2028 before she received notice in February that she had been “terminated, effective immediately.” Without Harris, the board lacks a quorum, which could hamper its ability to function as the Trump administration continues its sprawling efforts to gut the federal workforce.</p>
<p>Harris sued the Trump administration and won her job back through a temporary restraining order and a subsequent permanent injunction, both of which were issued by U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras. The administration appealed the district court’s ruling, and a three-judge appeals court panel late last month voted 2-1 in the government’s favor, staying Contreras’ injunction and allowing both firings to remain in place.</p>
<p>As <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/the-presidents-removal-power-is-the-rule-not-the-exception-doj-says-trump-can-fire-biden-appointed-civil-service-board-chair-and-appellate-court-agrees-again/">previously reported</a> by Law&amp;Crime, the 2-1 ruling was particularly vulnerable to being overturned because the majority’s opinion conflicted with long-standing legal precedent stemming from the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in <a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/295us602"><em>Humphrey’s Executor v. United States</em></a>, which controls the originating statute that created the MSPB: the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA).</p>
<p>In tandem, the two sources of law have, for decades, been understood to mean that a president can fire a member of an independent agency “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” Harris emphatically highlighted that understanding in her en banc appeal, accusing the three-judge panel of attempting to rewrite Supreme Court precedent by allowing Trump to remove her without cause.</p>
<p>While the high court has indicated that it may be inclined to address Humphrey’s Executor, the en banc majority was clear that the three-judge panel had gotten ahead of itself by essentially doing away with the precedent before the justices could weigh in on the matter.</p>
<p>The en banc panel found that the government failed to demonstrate it suffered an “irreparable injury” by reinstating Harris and Wilcox to their board positions because the claimed “intrusion on presidential power” that the administration asserted “only exists” if Humphrey’s Executor is overturned.</p>
<p>“‘No such power’ to remove a predominantly adjudicatory board official ‘is given to the President directly by the Constitution,’” the appeals court wrote.</p>
<p>The administration pushed back on that conclusion in its Wednesday filing:</p>
<p>“The President should not be forced to delegate his executive power to agency heads who are demonstrably at odds with the Administration’s policy objectives for a single day—much less for the months that it would likely take for the courts to resolve this litigation,” the filing stated.</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/email-newsletter/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&amp;Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.</strong></a></p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p><script>
  (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
</script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/chief-justice-roberts-again-saves-trump-admin-allowing-president-to-fire-biden-appointed-board-members-for-now/">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-bails-out-trump-on-labor-board-firings/">Chief Justice bails out Trump on labor board firings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-bails-out-trump-on-labor-board-firings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://lawandcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/asdfadfadfafd.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Averting immediate showdown, chief justice pauses judge&#8217;s deadline for US to restore foreign-aid funds</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/averting-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-judges-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/averting-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-judges-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 11:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Averting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreignaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pauses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials & Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/averting-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-judges-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Home Daily News Averting immediate showdown, chief justice… U.S. Supreme Court Averting immediate showdown, chief justice pauses judge&#8217;s deadline for US to restore foreign-aid funds By Debra Cassens Weiss February 27, 2025, 10:36 am CST The U.S. government doesn’t have to comply with a federal judge’s Wednesday night deadline to restore foreign-aid funds after Chief [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/averting-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-judges-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds/">Averting immediate showdown, chief justice pauses judge&#8217;s deadline for US to restore foreign-aid funds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="story_page_body" style="margin:0; padding:0; max-width:750px;">
		<!-- begin main content area --></p>
<ol class="breadcrumb">
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/" title="Home">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/" title="Read the Daily News">Daily News</a></li>
<li class="active">Averting immediate showdown, chief justice…</li>
</ol>
<p>U.S. Supreme Court</p>
<h2>Averting immediate showdown, chief justice pauses judge&#8217;s deadline for US to restore foreign-aid funds</h2>
<p>			<!-- toolbar --></p>
<p class="byline">By <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/authors/4/" title="View this author's information" style="color:{default_link_color};">Debra Cassens Weiss</a></p>
<p class="dateline"><time>February 27, 2025, 10:36 am CST</time></p>
<p>				<!-- primary story image --></p>
<div class="floating_image" style="max-width:750px; margin:20px 10px 10px 0;">
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_USAID_money.jpg" alt="shutterstock_USAID money" height="375" width="500"/></p>
<p><em>The U.S. government doesn’t have to comply with a federal judge’s Wednesday night deadline to restore foreign-aid funds after Chief Justice John Roberts issued an administrative stay in the matter. (Photo from <a href="https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/germany-feb-04-2025-hand-holding-2581119027">Shutterstock</a>)</em></p>
</p></div>
<p>				<!-- end primary story image --></p>
<p>			<!--no pagination logic--></p>
<p>The U.S. government doesn’t have to comply with a federal judge’s Wednesday night deadline to restore foreign-aid funds after Chief Justice John Roberts issued an administrative stay in the matter.</p>
<p>Roberts <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022625zr_8758.pdf">issued the temporary stay</a> late Wednesday in two consolidated lawsuits challenging a 90-day freeze in funding for foreign assistance programs. A plaintiff in one of the suits <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ruling-in-aba-lawsuit-federal-judge-blocks-pause-on-foreign-aid-but-does-not-order-trump-himself-to-act">is the ABA</a>, which had “tens of millions of dollars” in federal funding frozen for foreign rule of law and human rights programs, its suit said.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/26/usaid-aid-supreme-court-payment-deadline">Washington Post</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-administration-says-it-cannot-meet-court-deadline-foreign-aid-payments-2025-02-26">Reuters</a>, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/justice-department-judges-cant-comply-deadline-usaid-funds-rcna193837">NBC News</a>, <a href="https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2025/02/26/chief-justice-roberts-briefly-pauses-order-for-trump-to-pay-usaid-bills/?slreturn=20250227161929">Law.com</a>, <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/02/chief-justice-pauses-order-for-trump-to-pay-2-billion-in-foreign-aid-funding">SCOTUSblog</a> and the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/26/us/politics/trump-usaid-foreign-aid.html">New York Times</a> are among the publications with coverage.</p>
<p>Plaintiffs in the suit consolidated with the ABA’s alleged Feb. 19 that government defendants <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/contempt-sought-against-us-officials-for-alleged-brazen-defiance-of-court-order-on-foreign-aid-funds">showed “brazen defiance”</a> of a Feb. 13 temporary restraining order requiring restoration of funding.</p>
<p>U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali of the District of Columbia issued the Feb. 13 TRO. On Feb. 25, Ali issued a bench ruling setting the deadline at 11:59 p.m. Feb. 26 for compliance with his order requiring payment on completed contracts. The U.S. government immediately appealed.</p>
<p>Amir’s order appears to contemplate the immediate outlay of nearly $2 billion, according to the <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A831/348801/20250226200602007_AIDS_Vaccine_Advocacy_Coalition_et_al_application.pdf">stay request</a> filed with the Supreme Court by Acting U.S. Solicitor General Sarah Harris.</p>
<p>The government is committed to paying legitimate claims for work, and it is “undertaking significant efforts” toward that end, Harris said.</p>
<p>“What the government cannot do,” Harris wrote, “is pay arbitrarily determined demands on an arbitrary timeline of the district court’s choosing or according to extra-contractual rules that the court has devised. That mandate creates an untenable payment plan at odds with the president’s obligations under Article II to protect the integrity of the federal fisc and make appropriate judgments about foreign aid.”</p>
<p>The stay request argued that the suits amount to claims for breach of contract that should be heard by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.</p>
<p>The cases are <em>U.S. Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition</em> and <em>Trump v. Global Health Council</em>.</p>
<p>			<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/contact?referrer=https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/averting-an-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds" class="feedback-cta"><br />
    Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error.<br />
</a></p></div>
<p><script src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=250025978358202&amp;xfbml=1"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/averting-an-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds/?utm_source=feeds&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/averting-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-judges-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds/">Averting immediate showdown, chief justice pauses judge&#8217;s deadline for US to restore foreign-aid funds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/averting-immediate-showdown-chief-justice-pauses-judges-deadline-for-us-to-restore-foreign-aid-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_USAID_money.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>State chief justice with &#8216;millions of reasons&#8217; to fire court employees can&#8217;t do so unilaterally, top Arkansas court says</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/state-chief-justice-with-millions-of-reasons-to-fire-court-employees-cant-do-so-unilaterally-top-arkansas-court-says/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/state-chief-justice-with-millions-of-reasons-to-fire-court-employees-cant-do-so-unilaterally-top-arkansas-court-says/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor & Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unilaterally]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/state-chief-justice-with-millions-of-reasons-to-fire-court-employees-cant-do-so-unilaterally-top-arkansas-court-says/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Home Daily News State chief justice with &#8216;millions of reasons&#8217;… Judiciary State chief justice with &#8216;millions of reasons&#8217; to fire court employees can&#8217;t do so unilaterally, top Arkansas court says By Debra Cassens Weiss January 7, 2025, 3:37 pm CST The Arkansas Supreme Court stepped in Friday, when Chief Justice Karen Baker, the new chief [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/state-chief-justice-with-millions-of-reasons-to-fire-court-employees-cant-do-so-unilaterally-top-arkansas-court-says/">State chief justice with &#8216;millions of reasons&#8217; to fire court employees can&#8217;t do so unilaterally, top Arkansas court says</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="story_page_body" style="margin:0; padding:0; max-width:750px;">
		<!-- begin main content area --></p>
<ol class="breadcrumb">
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/" title="Home">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/" title="Read the Daily News">Daily News</a></li>
<li class="active">State chief justice with &#8216;millions of reasons&#8217;…</li>
</ol>
<p>Judiciary</p>
<h2>State chief justice with &#8216;millions of reasons&#8217; to fire court employees can&#8217;t do so unilaterally, top Arkansas court says</h2>
<p>			<!-- toolbar --></p>
<p class="byline">By <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/authors/4/" title="View this author's information" style="color:{default_link_color};">Debra Cassens Weiss</a></p>
<p class="dateline"><time>January 7, 2025, 3:37 pm CST</time></p>
<p>				<!-- primary story image --></p>
<div class="floating_image" style="max-width:750px; margin:20px 10px 10px 0;">
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/Arkansas_Justice_Karen_Baker.jpg" alt="Arkansas Justice Karen Baker" height="363" width="310"/></p>
<p><em>The Arkansas Supreme Court stepped in Friday, when Chief Justice Karen Baker, the new chief justice, tried to fire nearly a dozen employees, including the director of the Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts. (Photo from the <a href="https://arcourts.gov/courts/supreme-court/justices/chief-justice-karen-r-baker-position-1">Arkansas Judiciary</a>)</em></p>
</p></div>
<p>				<!-- end primary story image --></p>
<p>			<!--no pagination logic--></p>
<p>The Arkansas Supreme Court stepped in Friday, when the state’s new chief justice tried to fire nearly a dozen employees, including the director of the Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts.</p>
<p>In a <a href="https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/item/523224/index.do">Jan. 3 administrative order</a>, the state supreme court said Chief Justice Karen Baker can’t fire the director of the administrative office without the approval of a court majority. And the chief justice can’t fire other court employees, with the exception of her law clerks and administrative assistant, absent an order from the director of the administrative office, the state supreme court said.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2025/01/an-administrative-order-entered-by-the-arkansas-supreme-court-underscores-the-tension-among-the-members-of-that-august-body.html">Legal Profession Blog</a>, <a href="https://www.law360.com/articles/2280185">Law360</a>, the <a href="https://arkansasadvocate.com/2025/01/03/arkansas-supreme-court-majority-blocks-chief-justices-attempt-to-fire-10-judiciary-employees">Arkansas Advocate</a> (via <a href="https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2025/01/06/#227377">How Appealing)</a>, <a href="https://www.4029tv.com/article/arkansas-supreme-court-new-rules-chief-justice/63339973">4029TV.com</a> and <a href="https://www.kark.com/news/state-news/arkansas-supreme-court-chief-justice-speaks-out-on-controversial-firings-on-first-week-in-office">KARK.com</a> have coverage.</p>
<p>The Arkansas Supreme Court rescinded Baker’s termination orders, calling the situation “unnecessary and unfortunate.”</p>
<p>The events giving rise to the order began Jan. 2, when Baker called to her office the chief of supreme court police and the director of the administrative office. During the meeting, Baker “confronted the director and police chief about their responses to Freedom of Information Act requests involving her,” the state supreme court said, without offering specifics.</p>
<p>Baker indicated that she had prepared letters to fire both officials but was unsure whether she would do so, the Arkansas Supreme Court said. The next day, Baker told the police chief that he was fired and tried to fire at least 10 administrative office employees, including the office director.</p>
<p>A fellow justice who learned of the attempt asked to meet with Baker about her decisions, but the chief justice refused. When asked why the employees were being fired, Baker said she had “millions of reasons,” the state supreme court said.</p>
<p>Some of the employees have pending human resources complaints against the chief justice “for recent incidents,” the Arkansas Supreme Court said. The state supreme court’s decision did not delve into the FOIA request that appeared to prompt the attempted firings.</p>
<p>But a December report by <a href="https://talkbusiness.net/2024/12/arkansas-supreme-court-justice-did-not-want-video-footage-going-around">Talk Business &amp; Politics</a> said Baker had contacted the police chief after a reporter with Arkansas Business asked about surveillance footage purporting to show her entering the administrative offices.</p>
<p>“There better not be footage going around,” Baker reportedly said in a voicemail to the police chief. Baker later told Talk Business &amp; Politics that she never entered locked offices, and she did not know whether the reporter had made a FOIA request for the footage.</p>
<p>A separate FOIA controversy concerned a fellow justice, Justice Courtney Rae Hudson.</p>
<p>Baker was the only dissenter when the state supreme court <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/arkansas-justices-refer-each-other-for-discipline-in-freedom-of-information-case">tossed a lawsuit</a> by Hudson seeking to block release of emails to Arkansas Business that had been sent to her by the then-director of the state’s attorney ethics body, the Arkansas Office of Professional Conduct.</p>
<p>The emails, it turned out, “mostly concern operational matters at OPC, including an employee’s request for leave, a proposal for sizable raises for OPC staff, and a disagreement over whether the $195.50 purchase of an air fryer at Sam’s Club counted as a legitimate office expense,” according to an October story by the <a href="https://arkansasadvocate.com/2024/10/02/justice-courtney-hudson-releases-emails-that-cleaved-state-supreme-court-in-foia-dispute">Arkansas Advocate</a>.</p>
<p>The email clash in September prompted the state supreme court majority to refer Hudson and her lawyer to ethics regulators for investigation for “flagrant breaches of confidentiality” in the suit. Baker, in turn, referred the five-justice majority in the email case for disciplinary investigation.</p>
<p>Hudson did not participate in the email decision or in the Jan. 3 decision curbing the chief justice’s authority to fire employees.</p>
<p>Baker told KARK.com that the previous three chief justices had the power to hire and fire.</p>
<p>“As the first woman elected to be the chief justice for the state of Arkansas in the state’s history, I will accept no less authority than my predecessors have,” Baker told the broadcast station.</p>
</p></div>
<p><script src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=250025978358202&amp;xfbml=1"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/state-chief-justice-with-millions-of-reasons-to-fire-court-employees-cant-do-so-unilaterally-top-arkansas-court-says/?utm_source=feeds&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/state-chief-justice-with-millions-of-reasons-to-fire-court-employees-cant-do-so-unilaterally-top-arkansas-court-says/">State chief justice with &#8216;millions of reasons&#8217; to fire court employees can&#8217;t do so unilaterally, top Arkansas court says</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/state-chief-justice-with-millions-of-reasons-to-fire-court-employees-cant-do-so-unilaterally-top-arkansas-court-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/Arkansas_Justice_Karen_Baker.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Justice Roberts Issues 2024 Year-End Report</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-roberts-issues-2024-year-end-report/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-roberts-issues-2024-year-end-report/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YearEnd]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-roberts-issues-2024-year-end-report/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has issued his 2024 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary (pdf). This is the 20th report Chief Justice Roberts has issued since he was appointed chief justice in 2005. For reports from previous years, visit the U.S. Supreme Court website. Source link</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-roberts-issues-2024-year-end-report/">Chief Justice Roberts Issues 2024 Year-End Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div>
<p>Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has issued his <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2024year-endreport.pdf">2024 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary</a> (pdf).</p>
<p>This is the 20th report Chief Justice Roberts has issued since he was appointed chief justice in 2005.</p>
<p>For reports from previous years, visit the <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/year-endreports.aspx">U.S. Supreme Court website</a>.</p>
</p></div>
<p><br />
<br /><a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/judiciary-news/2024/12/31/chief-justice-roberts-issues-2024-year-end-report">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-roberts-issues-2024-year-end-report/">Chief Justice Roberts Issues 2024 Year-End Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-roberts-issues-2024-year-end-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Justice Names Conference Committee Chairs</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-3/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 03:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Names]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-3/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has named five new chairs of Judicial Conference committees and extended the term of five current chairs by one year. The appointments took effect Oct. 1. Judge Robert J. Jonker (Michigan-Western) succeeded Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod (Fifth Circuit) as chair of the Committee on Codes of Conduct. Judge Michael [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-3/">Chief Justice Names Conference Committee Chairs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div>
<p>
	Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has named five new chairs of Judicial Conference committees and extended the term of five current chairs by one year. The appointments took effect Oct. 1.
</p>
<ul>
<li>
		Judge Robert J. Jonker (Michigan-Western) succeeded Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod (Fifth Circuit) as chair of the Committee on Codes of Conduct.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Michael Y. Scudder (Seventh Circuit) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Information Technology.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis (New York-Eastern) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Intercircuit Assignments.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge William B. Traxler, Jr., (Fourth Circuit) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Nancy L. Moritz (Tenth Circuit) succeeded Judge Brian S. Miller (Arkansas-Eastern) as chair of the Committee on Judicial Resources.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Richard J. Sullivan (Second Circuit) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Judicial Security.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Nancy E. Brasel (Minnesota) succeeded Judge Marcia Morales Howard (Florida-Middle) as chair of the Committee on the Administration of the Magistrate Judges System.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge John D. Bates (District of Columbia) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Allison H. Eid (Tenth Circuit) succeeded Judge Jay S. Bybee (Ninth Circuit) as chair of the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Jesse M. Furman (New York-Southern) succeeded Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz (Minnesota) as chair of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules.
	</li>
</ul>
<p>
	The 26-member <a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/administration-policies/governance-judicial-conference/about-judicial-conference-united-states">Judicial Conference</a> is the policy-making body for the federal court system. By statute, the Chief Justice of the United States serves as its presiding officer and its members are the chief judges of the 13 courts of appeals, a district judge from each of the 12 geographic circuits and the chief judge of the Court of International Trade. The Conference meets twice a year to consider administrative and policy issues affecting the court system and to make recommendations to Congress concerning legislation involving the Judicial Branch.
</p>
</div>
<p><br />
<br /><a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/judiciary-news/2024/10/01/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-3/">Chief Justice Names Conference Committee Chairs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Justice Names Conference Committee Chairs</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-2/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Names]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-2/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Main content Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has named five new chairs of Judicial Conference committees and extended the term of five current chairs by one year. The appointments took effect Oct. 1. Judge Robert J. Jonker (Michigan-Western) succeeded Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod (Fifth Circuit) as chair of the Committee on Codes of Conduct. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-2/">Chief Justice Names Conference Committee Chairs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="main" aria-label="US Courts blue seal">
<div id="content" role="main">
    <a id="skip-main-content" class="element-invisible element-focusable">Main content</a></p>
<div class="field field-name-body">
<p>
	Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has named five new chairs of Judicial Conference committees and extended the term of five current chairs by one year. The appointments took effect Oct. 1.
</p>
<ul>
<li>
		Judge Robert J. Jonker (Michigan-Western) succeeded Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod (Fifth Circuit) as chair of the Committee on Codes of Conduct.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Michael Y. Scudder (Seventh Circuit) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Information Technology.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis (New York-Eastern) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Intercircuit Assignments.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge William B. Traxler, Jr., (Fourth Circuit) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Nancy L. Moritz (Tenth Circuit) succeeded Judge Brian S. Miller (Arkansas-Eastern) as chair of the Committee on Judicial Resources.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Richard J. Sullivan (Second Circuit) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Judicial Security.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Nancy E. Brasel (Minnesota) succeeded Judge Marcia Morales Howard (Florida-Middle) as chair of the Committee on the Administration of the Magistrate Judges System.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge John D. Bates (District of Columbia) was extended for one year as chair of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Allison H. Eid (Tenth Circuit) succeeded Judge Jay S. Bybee (Ninth Circuit) as chair of the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules.
	</li>
<li>
		Judge Jesse M. Furman (New York-Southern) succeeded Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz (Minnesota) as chair of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules.
	</li>
</ul>
<p>
	The 26-member <a href="https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/governance-judicial-conference/about-judicial-conference">Judicial Conference</a> is the policy-making body for the federal court system. By statute, the Chief Justice of the United States serves as its presiding officer and its members are the chief judges of the 13 courts of appeals, a district judge from each of the 12 geographic circuits and the chief judge of the Court of International Trade. The Conference meets twice a year to consider administrative and policy issues affecting the court system and to make recommendations to Congress concerning legislation involving the Judicial Branch.
</p>
</div>
<p><strong class="label-inline">Related Topics: </strong><a href="https://www.uscourts.gov/topics/judicial-conference-united-states">Judicial Conference of the United States</a></p>
</p></div>
<p> <!-- /#content --></p></div>
<p><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.uscourts.gov/news/2024/10/01/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-2/">Chief Justice Names Conference Committee Chairs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/chief-justice-names-conference-committee-chairs-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
