<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>185M Archives - Home Safety Tech Pros</title>
	<atom:link href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/185m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/tag/185m/</link>
	<description>Home Safety Tech Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel&#8217;s $185M fee, an amount deemed &#8216;astronomical&#8217; by objectors</title>
		<link>https://homesafetytechpros.com/judge-cuts-quinn-emanuels-185m-fee-an-amount-deemed-astronomical-by-objectors/</link>
					<comments>https://homesafetytechpros.com/judge-cuts-quinn-emanuels-185m-fee-an-amount-deemed-astronomical-by-objectors/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homesafetytechpros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[185M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACA Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Career & Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deemed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emanuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance & Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials & Litigation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://homesafetytechpros.com/judge-cuts-quinn-emanuels-185m-fee-an-amount-deemed-astronomical-by-objectors/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Home Daily News Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel&#8217;s $185M fee, an… Law Firms Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel&#8217;s $185M fee, an amount deemed &#8216;astronomical&#8217; by objectors By Debra Cassens Weiss October 14, 2024, 1:12 pm CDT A federal judge has slashed a $185 million fee that she initially awarded to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &#38; Sullivan, an amount [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/judge-cuts-quinn-emanuels-185m-fee-an-amount-deemed-astronomical-by-objectors/">Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel&#8217;s $185M fee, an amount deemed &#8216;astronomical&#8217; by objectors</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
</p>
<div id="story_page_body" style="margin:0; padding:0; max-width:750px;">
<ol class="breadcrumb">
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/" title="Home">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/" title="Read the Daily News">Daily News</a></li>
<li class="active">Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel&#8217;s $185M fee, an…</li>
</ol>
<p>Law Firms</p>
<h2>Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel&#8217;s $185M fee, an amount deemed &#8216;astronomical&#8217; by objectors</h2>
<p class="byline">By <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/authors/4/" title="View this author's information" style="color:{default_link_color};">Debra Cassens Weiss</a></p>
<p class="dateline"><time>October 14, 2024, 1:12 pm CDT</time></p>
<div class="floating_image" style="max-width:750px; margin:20px 10px 10px 0;">
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_100_dollars_money_pile.jpg" alt="100 dollars money pile" height="332" width="500"/></p>
<p><em>A federal judge has slashed a $185 million fee that she initially awarded to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan, an amount that translated to about $18,500 per hour for its work in an insurance class action lawsuit. (Image from Shutterstock)</em></p>
</div>
<p>A federal judge has slashed a $185 million fee that she initially awarded to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan, an amount that translated to about $18,500 per hour for its work in an insurance class action lawsuit.</p>
<p>U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Kathryn C. Davis had initially awarded Quinn Emanuel 5% of a $3.7 billion judgment for about 10,000 hours of work. In an <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/files/QuinnEmFees.pdf">Oct. 10 opinion</a>, she reduced the law firm’s claimed hours by 15% and reduced the award to 2.5% of the recovery, amounting to $92.4 million.</p>
<p>Davis reduced the award after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judges-failure-to-conduct-lodestar-cross-check-dooms-quinn-emanuels-185m-fee-award">said she failed</a> to properly conduct a “lodestar cross-check.” The cross-check considers hours worked, billing rates and a risk multiplier to compensate for the risk of no or reduced recovery.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-slashes-185-mln-award-law-firm-quinn-emanuel-us-healthcare-case-2024-10-10">Reuters</a> and <a href="https://www.law360.com/articles/1889409">Law360</a> have stories.</p>
<p>Quinn Emanuel <a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/quinn-emanuel-seeks-fee-amounting-to-18500-an-hour-will-judge-approve-it">sought the attorney fee</a> for suing on behalf of two classes of health insurers in litigation under the Affordable Care Act. The insurers said the federal government did not abide by its promise to pay them for losses incurred for the first three years of participation in the law’s insurance marketplace.</p>
<p>Health insurers who opposed the fee amount said it was “astronomical,” according to Reuters. They said Davis should award between $11.77 million and $23.14 million.</p>
<p>Davis said the amount requested by objecting insurers was “so low as to disincentivize attorneys from pursuing class actions.” She said Quinn Emanuel “pioneered” a “novel, winning legal theory” based on “an untested argument.”</p>
<p>After Quinn Emanuel sued, copycat suits followed. They led the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm Quinn Emanuel’s theory, Davis said. The novelty and complexity of Quinn Emanuel’s claim, along with the risk of nonpayment if the litigation didn’t succeed, justify a multiplier of 9.56, Davis said.</p>
<p>The multiplier is calculated by multiplying a firm’s hours by their rates. Davis used the reduced hours and Quinn Emanuel’s 2020 rates to calculate the multiplier.</p>
<p>Quinn Emanuel had obtained “judgment preservation insurance” on nearly $167 million of the $185 million fee award, Bloomberg Law <a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/quinn-emanuels-185-million-fee-mostly-insured-as-fight-goes-on">reported in March</a>. Typically, judgment preservation insurance<a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/quinn-emanuel-disclosure-order-highlights-relatively-new-product-judgment-preservation-insurance"> is used</a> to preserve a portion of large awards from being overturned on appeal.</p>
<p>The case is <em>Health Republic Insurance Co. v. United States</em>.</p>
</div>
<p><script src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=250025978358202&amp;xfbml=1"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judge-cuts-quinn-emanuel-185m-fee-request-deemed-astronomical-by-objectors/?utm_source=feeds&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com/judge-cuts-quinn-emanuels-185m-fee-an-amount-deemed-astronomical-by-objectors/">Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel&#8217;s $185M fee, an amount deemed &#8216;astronomical&#8217; by objectors</a> appeared first on <a href="https://homesafetytechpros.com">Home Safety Tech Pros</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://homesafetytechpros.com/judge-cuts-quinn-emanuels-185m-fee-an-amount-deemed-astronomical-by-objectors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url="https://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/shutterstock_100_dollars_money_pile.jpg" medium="image"></media:content>
            	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
